2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A techno-economic case study of CO2 capture, transport and storage chain from a cement plant in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) The diameter, wall thickness, and inlet pressure are uniform in each pipeline segment. (5) The outlet pressure of each pipeline segment equals the injection pressure. (6) The pipeline links one capture source to one oil field.…”
Section: Basic Assumption For Pipeline Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) The diameter, wall thickness, and inlet pressure are uniform in each pipeline segment. (5) The outlet pressure of each pipeline segment equals the injection pressure. (6) The pipeline links one capture source to one oil field.…”
Section: Basic Assumption For Pipeline Transportationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon dioxide is generally considered as one of the main reasons for climatic variation . Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is regarded as a powerful technological solution for reducing global CO 2 emissions, which includes the three sub‐systems of CO 2 capture: transportation, utilization, and storage. Pipeline is a preferred approach for large‐scale and long‐distance CO 2 transportation as a link to transport CO 2 from the source to the oil field for CCUS projects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transportation is uncontrolled pressure drop in the pipeline what may result in liquid-gas two-phase system flow [7].…”
Section: Ictle 2018mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…use as a chemical feedstock), EOR can provide long-term storage and is able to increase the production of an economically valuable resource [6]. CO 2 -EOR is expected to produce additional 5-20% of the original oil in place (OOIP) [4] and it is also identified to have a strong potential to reduce the overall CCS cost, however the cost benefits are strongly dependent on the oil price and the considered EOR injection period [2]. CO 2 -EOR is usually a large-scale project and requires techno-economic evaluation before its deployment, a particularly important issue in this assessment is the availability of a low-cost source of CO 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 -EOR is usually a large-scale project and requires techno-economic evaluation before its deployment, a particularly important issue in this assessment is the availability of a low-cost source of CO 2. The issue of selection of sources of CO 2 for projects CCS-CO 2 -EOR is raised in a number of references [1][2][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%