2017
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.201600507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Techno‐Economic Analysis of Chemical Processing with Ionizing Radiation

Abstract: Photons and electrons with energies above the ionization potential of most atoms can be used to facilitate chemical reactions not otherwise possible thermochemically or under more preferable process conditions. An analysis and comparison of the economics of using sources of ultraviolet photons, high‐energy electrons, γ‐rays, and X‐rays in a chemical conversion process is presented. In many processes where the penetration depth is sufficient, the overall production costs for equivalent products are lowest for e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of late, co-production with nuclear systems 2 , 7 – 10 has attracted attention, particularly for hydrogen production and water desalination. However, these options are comparable to electricity production in terms of profitability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of late, co-production with nuclear systems 2 , 7 – 10 has attracted attention, particularly for hydrogen production and water desalination. However, these options are comparable to electricity production in terms of profitability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we are only aware of very few examples of commodity organic chemicals produced commercially using radiation, most of them involve the use of radicals like bromine and iodine [39][40][41]. Other organic chemicals, however, are certainly also possible [42][43][44]. Several excellent candidates could be produced through photo-chemical processes using radiation from nuclear reactors.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, other sources of energy could be used for the same chemistry, but at a different cost, for instance, thermal energy is currently priced in the range of $2 -$10 per GJ, electrochemical energy is $25 -$50/GJ, UV light in the $50 -$500/GJ and gamma rays from cobalt-60 at approximately $900/GJ [44]. The cost of radiation from a nuclear reactor, for this case, is not easy to define, since most of the capital required to capture the offgas, which would act as radiation source, is already considered in the nuclear reactor costing, thus it is assumed that the radiation source adds little to the overall combined heat-chemical process.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,5 As an option to increase the economic viability of nextgeneration nuclear energy, production of a secondary product, such as a chemical feedstock, would provide an additional product stream and, with that, a secondary source of income. 1,4,6 A second major barrier to advancing nuclear energy production is public perception, and the ability of unused radiation from nuclear reactors to convert recalcitrant, low-value biomass into desirable products may improve public perception of nuclear reactors. 7 Combined with net-zero goals in chemical feedstock production, dual-use nuclear systems for energy and commodity production can have a significant impact on meeting carbon footprint reduction goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%