1986
DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A technique using analytical hierarchy process in multiobjective planning models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the AHP one simply uses an individual's understanding together with a way to convert his judgments to ratios to deal with optimization. Olson et al, [1986] proposed a technique of analysis for multiple objective policy models that uses the AHP as a means of initially checking for consistency. A simple pattern search around this initial solution will provide decision makers with alternatives for comparison.…”
Section: Development Of Methodology Of the Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the AHP one simply uses an individual's understanding together with a way to convert his judgments to ratios to deal with optimization. Olson et al, [1986] proposed a technique of analysis for multiple objective policy models that uses the AHP as a means of initially checking for consistency. A simple pattern search around this initial solution will provide decision makers with alternatives for comparison.…”
Section: Development Of Methodology Of the Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP has been widely used in the areas of social science, engineering and business to assess the relative importance (weights) of different criteria in the provision of a good or service, and following on from this, to derive scores for given goods and services. [214][215][216][217][218][219][220][221][222][223][224] There are four main stages involved in conducting an AHP study: 220 Step 1 -Structure the problem: the first stage when using AHP is to construct a decision hierarchy for the overall problem being considered. This will usually involve stating the objective (level 1), the criteria that are important in achieving this objective (level 2), and the alternatives that may be used to achieve the objective, which will comprise different components of the criteria (level 3).…”
Section: Analytic Hierarchy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application of the two techniques has been proposed and introduced previously (Olson et al, 1986;Suresh and Kaparthi, 1992;Zakarian and Kusiak, 1999), it has been a very much accepted research and development tool. The development and application of these tool sets to information technology and supply chain management issues has not been realized as frequently in the literature.…”
Section: A Methodological Framework For Evaluation Of Software and Comentioning
confidence: 98%