1994
DOI: 10.1016/0308-521x(94)90105-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A technique to develop and validate simulation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The four methods were also compared for their ability to estimate RII dynamics for a different year using a cross‐validation technique (Jones & Carberry, 1994). Five regression equations were calculated using the pooled data of four years, excluding one year in turn; afterwards, these equations were used to estimate the data for the year not included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four methods were also compared for their ability to estimate RII dynamics for a different year using a cross‐validation technique (Jones & Carberry, 1994). Five regression equations were calculated using the pooled data of four years, excluding one year in turn; afterwards, these equations were used to estimate the data for the year not included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this procedure, the data is randomly divided into K-fold (in this paper K = 5) datasets of approximately equal size ( Jones and Carberry, 1994;Kohavi, 1995). In this procedure, the data is randomly divided into K-fold (in this paper K = 5) datasets of approximately equal size ( Jones and Carberry, 1994;Kohavi, 1995).…”
Section: Model Optimization and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a fivefold cross-validation statistical procedure to assess the prediction accuracy of optimized model parameters in DD10, DD_Opt, DD_2S, and DD_3S for all developmental stages. In this procedure, the data is randomly divided into K-fold (in this paper K = 5) datasets of approximately equal size ( Jones and Carberry, 1994;Kohavi, 1995). Model results are presented as the mean of the resulting five sample RMSEs ( James et al, 2013).…”
Section: Model Optimization and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of techniques have been explored for implementing calibration procedures to estimate model input parameters. In general, most techniques involve an optimization algorithm that solves for the parameter set that maximizes or minimizes an objective function (Jones and Carberry, 1994;Calmon et al, 1999;Irmak et al, 2001). Typically, the root mean square error (RMSE), or related error statistics, between simulated output and measured values is the objective function to be minimized in the calibration of crop models Gauch et al, 2003 (Jones and Carberry, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the LOO cross validation technique, observations in the measured dataset are iteratively and exhaustively used for both model calibration and model testing, resulting in an estimate of model predictive performance that is more reliable than estimates from the two-group partition method and less biased than estimates derived from calibration-dependent datasets (Jones and Carberry, 1994). Given a measured dataset having (1994) and Irmak et al (2000); however, these techniques have not been used within a precision agriculture framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%