2007
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A technique for the deidentification of structural brain MR images

Abstract: Due to the increasing need for subject privacy, the ability to deidentify structural MR images so that they do not provide full facial detail is desirable. A program was developed that uses models of nonbrain structures for removing potentially identifying facial features.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
144
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been fully described [31] and validated via both histological and manual measurements [32,33]. For cortical analysis, the gray/white matter interface in each hemisphere was segmented, tessellated, corrected for topological errors, and inflated to unfold the cortical surface.…”
Section: Cortical Thickness Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been fully described [31] and validated via both histological and manual measurements [32,33]. For cortical analysis, the gray/white matter interface in each hemisphere was segmented, tessellated, corrected for topological errors, and inflated to unfold the cortical surface.…”
Section: Cortical Thickness Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method implemented in the open source software FreeSurfer can be used to extract the cortical envelope from a T1-weighted MRI scan and to register the individual cortex surfaces to surface-based anatomical atlases 14,15 allowing for surface-based groupwise comparisons. Here, we employed FreeSurfer 16 to compare the regional cortical thickness in PD patients with and without FOG using high-resolution anatomical T1-weighted imaging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subject's identity can sometimes be discovered from a three-dimensional surface reconstruction of the subject's head, which may lead to violations of HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) regulations and IRB (Institutional Review Board) requirements that protect subject confidentiality. To address these concerns, applications have been developed that black-out (i.e., replace with black voxels) (Bischoff-Grethe et al 2004) or warp (Shattuck et al 2003) facial features in MRI image volumes. Currently these applications require significant processing time, can only be directly applied to T1-weighted images, and run the risk (Shattuck et al 2003) of altering the imaged brain anatomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%