2023
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“A Technique for Severe Lower Eyelid Retraction – The Fascia Lata Sling with Lateral Burr Hole”

Abstract: Background: Lower eyelid retraction is a common and feared complication of both disease processes and aesthetic and cosmetic surgical procedures. A four-finger approach has been previously described to determine adequate treatment of lid retraction. In the authors’ experience, they have found that even the most aggressive treatment approach—subperiosteal cheek lift with canthopexy and interpositional graft—is inadequate to address severe lower lid retraction. Methods: The authors propose a technique of a low… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have combined fascial grafting with other methods to treat lower eyelid ectropion, including a combination of large advancement flaps and lateral burr holes. 11,12 However, this method, focused on Horner muscle and involving medialposterior traction in combination with fascial grafting, is a new treatment option for severe eyelid ectropion. This study's limitations include its retrospective nature, small sample size, and lack of a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have combined fascial grafting with other methods to treat lower eyelid ectropion, including a combination of large advancement flaps and lateral burr holes. 11,12 However, this method, focused on Horner muscle and involving medialposterior traction in combination with fascial grafting, is a new treatment option for severe eyelid ectropion. This study's limitations include its retrospective nature, small sample size, and lack of a control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%