1965
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A TECHNIQUE FOR RECORDING HEART‐RATE IN MOVING RATS1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 were recorded from one Grass disc electrode chronically implanted under the skin and from one of the EMG electrodes. It is worth noting that this method permitted the recording of heart-rate signals of greater amplitude than was possible with our original technique (de Toledo and Black, 1965).A few years ago, Sutton and Miller (1965) described a mercury swivel designed to provide electrical recordings without movement artifact from freely moving animals; we found the mercury swivel unsatisfactory for noise-free recordings. The main objections were interference due to movement artifact caused when the swivel rotated rapidly and the frequent oxidation of the mercury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 were recorded from one Grass disc electrode chronically implanted under the skin and from one of the EMG electrodes. It is worth noting that this method permitted the recording of heart-rate signals of greater amplitude than was possible with our original technique (de Toledo and Black, 1965).A few years ago, Sutton and Miller (1965) described a mercury swivel designed to provide electrical recordings without movement artifact from freely moving animals; we found the mercury swivel unsatisfactory for noise-free recordings. The main objections were interference due to movement artifact caused when the swivel rotated rapidly and the frequent oxidation of the mercury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 were recorded from one Grass disc electrode chronically implanted under the skin and from one of the EMG electrodes. It is worth noting that this method permitted the recording of heart-rate signals of greater amplitude than was possible with our original technique (de Toledo and Black, 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%