1987
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1987.140250304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A technique for monitoring the kinetics of flow-induced crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter finding implies that those models proposed to describe the kinetics of shear-induced ("stre~s-induced"~~) crystallization, which consider the formation of solely one crystalline modification (e.g., ref. 36 and 37), should be treated with criticism in the case of iPP.…”
Section: Effects Of the Quality Of The Ippmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The latter finding implies that those models proposed to describe the kinetics of shear-induced ("stre~s-induced"~~) crystallization, which consider the formation of solely one crystalline modification (e.g., ref. 36 and 37), should be treated with criticism in the case of iPP.…”
Section: Effects Of the Quality Of The Ippmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Video images were converted to crystallization isotherm data following the methods described in Ref. 7. In the present case, maximum and minimum fiber intensity at the center of the sample corresponded respectively to conditions of increasing intensity or fringe formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the various functional forms for f ( A)21-25 along with appropriate parameters difference between T, and T,*. Thus, in constructing undercooling plots wt have used the value 78.3"C, which corresponds to a calculated melting point elevation of 0.2"C. Figure 8 shows the resulting plot of k,, versus the undercooling parameter for heterogeneous growth, which exhibits a pattern quite similar to that found in flow-induced crystallization (7). In the latter case, Avrami coefficients of 2 and 2.5 were interpreted mechanistically in terms of a one-dimensional growth process with sporadic nucleation.…”
Section: We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He explained that this was a result of a decreasing fraction of the amorphous phase and the resulting stress relaxation due to crystallization. The kinetics of flow‐induced crystallization in polyethylene was studied by McHugh and Spevacek34 by measuring the changes in the intensity of transmitted polarized light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%