2015
DOI: 10.1111/ext.12154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Technique for Comparing Wall Pressure Distributions in Steady Flow Through Rigid Versus Flexible Patient-based Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Phantoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have also been reported in []. However, experimental measurements have shown wall pressure to be non‐uniform even under steady flow . This finding underscores the importance of need for close coupling of experimental wall pressure measurements to wall stress calculations, in part because of the need to verify CFD analyses and in part because at present there is no general agreement on the most appropriate turbulence model to accurately simulate the low Reynolds number, separated, transitional flows found in AAAs in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have also been reported in []. However, experimental measurements have shown wall pressure to be non‐uniform even under steady flow . This finding underscores the importance of need for close coupling of experimental wall pressure measurements to wall stress calculations, in part because of the need to verify CFD analyses and in part because at present there is no general agreement on the most appropriate turbulence model to accurately simulate the low Reynolds number, separated, transitional flows found in AAAs in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The shape of their pressure distributions versus axial location at systole and diastole were somewhat different from those in the current study, which is expected considering their dissimilar phantom shape. Peattie et al . measured pressure in a similarly‐shaped AAA phantom under steady flow conditions and obtained pressure versus distance curves that varied about 50 % more with axial position than the data shown in Figure a, possibly due to the different shapes of the renal arteries in their model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous investigations [15][16][17][18] used phantoms from stiff photopolymers that lack compliance of arteries vital for device placement. To capture the flexible and compliant nature of the arteries, other investigators have followed similar approaches by fabricating a stiff 3D printed cast for silicone or polyurethane injection molding [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations have traditionally been fabricated from stiff photopolymers that lack compliance of arteries vital for graft deployment. Many have followed this approach by fabricating a stiff 3D printed cast for silicone or polyurethane injection molding, creating systems to capture the flexible and compliant nature of the arteries [1520] . However, this method is very time intensive, requiring days for molding, casting, and layering, in addition to producing phantoms with more rigid properties than human vasculature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%