A Team Training Program Using Human Factors to Enhance Patient Safety

Marshall, David A.; Manus, Danae A.

doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2007.11.026

Cited by 58 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The COMPaZ is the translated and validated Dutch version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture33 and successfully applied in various studies 34 35…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before–after study

Kemper

Bruijne

Dyck³

et al. 2016

BMJ Qual Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The COMPaZ is the translated and validated Dutch version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture33 and successfully applied in various studies 34 35…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before–after study

Kemper

Bruijne

Dyck³

et al. 2016

BMJ Qual Saf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We identified 8, 949studies based on our initial searching; Initial sifting based on title, abstract and full text resulted in exclusion of 6336 studies; 30 studies were further reviewed and two studies were excluded (non-comparative study [23], ergonomics intervention both in the control and intervention groups [24]).Finally, 28 studies with 3,227 participants were included in the final analysis (Fig 1). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundFrom the viewpoint of human factors and ergonomics (HFE), errors often occur because of the mismatch between the system, technique and characteristics of the human body. HFE is a scientific discipline concerned with understanding interactions between human behavior, system design and safety.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of HFE interventions in improving health care workers’ outcomes and patient safety and to assess the quality of the available evidence.MethodsWe searched databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and the CBM (Chinese BioMedical Literature Database), for articles published from 1996 to Mar.2015. The quality assessment tool was based on the risk of bias criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group. The interventions of the included studies were categorized into four relevant domains, as defined by the International Ergonomics Association.ResultsFor this descriptive study, we identified 8, 949 studies based on our initial search. Finally, 28 studies with 3,227 participants were included. Among the 28 included studies, 20 studies were controlled studies, two of which were randomized controlled trials. The other eight studies were before/after surveys, without controls. Most of the studies were of moderate or low quality. Five broad categories of outcomes were identified in this study: 1) medical errors or patient safety, 2) health care workers’ quality of working life (e.g. reduced fatigue, discomfort, workload, pain and injury), 3) user performance (e.g., efficiency or accuracy), 4) health care workers’ attitudes towards the interventions(e.g., satisfaction and preference), and 5) economic evaluations.ConclusionThe results showed that the interventions positively affected the outcomes of health care workers. Few studies considered the financial merits of these interventions. Most of the included studies were of moderate quality. This review highlights the need for scientific and standardized guidelines regarding how HFE should be implemented in health care.

show abstract

“…It attributes faulty communication and organizational culture as contributing factors in sentinel event occurrences and endorses structured training programs to increase the effectiveness of team communication and functioning. 6 Often, human error results when a fundamental process is not observed or a breakdown in the system occurs, causing harm to a patient. 5 In Fall 2008, while presenting a lecture in Ireland, I became aware of a recent wrong-site surgery case.…”

Section: Wrong-site Surgical Errorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Looking Beyond Borders: Surgical Safety Is a Universal Matter

Brady¹

2009

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Team Training Program Using Human Factors to Enhance Patient Safety

Cited by 58 publications

References 7 publications

Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before–after study

Crew resource management training in the intensive care unit. A multisite controlled before–after study

An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review

Looking Beyond Borders: Surgical Safety Is a Universal Matter

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About