A team approach to improving colorectal cancer services using administrative health data

Abstract

BackgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and accounts for 11.9% of all cancer-related mortality. Fortunately, previous studies have provided evidence of improved outcomes from access to timely and appropriate health services along the disease trajectory in CRC. As a result, the CIHR/CCNS Team in Access to Colorectal Cancer Services in Nova Scotia (Team ACCESS) was created to build colorectal cancer (CRC) research capacity in Nova Scotia (NS) and to study access to and quality of CRC services along the entire continuum of cancer care.ObjectivesThe objectives of this paper are to: 1) provide a detailed description of the methodologies employed across the various studies being conducted by Team ACCESS; 2) demonstrate how administrative health data can be used to evaluate access and quality in CRC services; and 3) provide an example of an interdisciplinary team approach to addressing health service delivery issues.MethodsAll patients diagnosed with CRC in NS between 2001 and 2005 were identified through the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry (NSCR) and staged using the Collaborative Stage Data Collection System. Using administrative databases that were linked at the patient level, Team ACCESS created a retrospective longitudinal cohort with comprehensive demographic, clinical, and healthcare utilization data. These data were used to examine access to and quality of CRC services in NS, as well as factors affecting access to and quality of care, at various transition points along the continuum of care. Team ACCESS has also implemented integrated knowledge translation strategies targeting policy- and decision- makers.DiscussionThe development of Team ACCESS represents a unique approach to CRC research. We anticipate that the skills, tools, and knowledge generated from our work will also advance the study of other cancer disease sites in NS. Given the increasing prevalence of cancer, and with national and provincial funding agencies promoting collaborative research through increased funding for research team development, the work carried out by Team ACCESS is important in the Canadian context and exemplifies how a team approach is essential to comprehensively addressing issues surrounding not only cancer, but other chronic diseases in Canada.

Are Quality Indicators associated with Postoperative Outcomes after Resection for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma?

“…In fact, approximately 18% of patients underwent surgical therapy with radiological tests older than 2 months and 6% of patients waited longer than eight weeks for their surgeries. Nevertheless, despite the long waiting times, the rate of resection with positive margins (R1/R2) in our study was 38% similar to others recent studies [15].…”

“…The methodology used to link these administrative datasets has been described in details in previous manuscripts published by our group [12][13][14][15]. Using DAD, patients who underwent surgery were identified using ICD-9/10 procedure codes.…”

Clinical Information Available to Oncologists in Surgically Treated Rectal Cancer: Room to Improve

“…This linked dataset, described in detail elsewhere 10 , provided clinicodemographic, diagnostic, treatment, and health care utilization data for patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the province.…”

“…There is no doubt that significant advances have occurred in pathology reporting, specifically in colorectal cancer. Deficiencies in elements such as nodal harvest and reporting of radial margins have been identified in several previous studies, with both elements having been proposed as quality indicators for rectal cancer care 10 . In North America, the College of American Pathologists has made a significant investment in the creation and maintenance of checklists for cancer reporting 20 .…”

Use of Opioid Analgesics Among Older Persons With Colorectal Cancer in Two Health Districts With Palliative Care Programs

“…Further details related to this larger study, including descriptions of the various linked databases and a detailed explanation of the data linkage process, are reported elsewhere. 22 Ethical approval was obtained from the Capital District Health Authority's Research Ethics Board.…”