2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tb-MOF anion, porous coordination framework constructed with oxalate ligand: Crystal structure, adsorption properties, and luminescence sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the LUMO level of the detected substance is lower, electrons are easily transferred to the detected substance, which results in the interference of energy transfer between the ligand and metal ions, leading to fluorescence quenching. 34,35 As shown in Fig. 10b, according to the DFT calculation, the LUMO levels of H 2 ox (−1.97 eV) and H 2 bct (−1.05 eV) was higher than that of chlorogenic acid (−2.13 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When the LUMO level of the detected substance is lower, electrons are easily transferred to the detected substance, which results in the interference of energy transfer between the ligand and metal ions, leading to fluorescence quenching. 34,35 As shown in Fig. 10b, according to the DFT calculation, the LUMO levels of H 2 ox (−1.97 eV) and H 2 bct (−1.05 eV) was higher than that of chlorogenic acid (−2.13 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Then, according to the equation LOD = 3σ/ K SV , the limits of detection (LOD) were calculated, where σ refers to the standard error of fluorescence intensity . As shown in Table , the K SV value of JY1 for IDP reaches 50,063 M –1 , being 23–51 times higher than those of the previously reported porous organic polymers PAN-Cs (980–2173 M –1 ), and exceeds that of Tb-MOFs (36,000 M –1 ) . Moreover, the LOD of JY1 for IDP is as low as 30 ppb (1.2 × 10 –7 M), which is far below the maximum residue limits of IDP allowed in citrus fruits by the European Union (0.9 ppm)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…3 As shown in Table 2, the K SV value of JY1 for IDP reaches 50,063 M −1 , being 23−51 times higher than those of the previously reported porous organic polymers PAN-Cs (980−2173 M −1 ), 37 and exceeds that of Tb-MOFs (36,000 M −1 ). 52 Moreover, the LOD of JY1 for IDP is as low as 30 ppb (1.2 × 10 −7 M), which is far below the maximum residue limits of IDP allowed in citrus fruits by the European Union (0.9 ppm). 53 The structure−property relationship of the four pesticides in the two polymers is illustrated in Figure 5.…”
Section: Table 1 Porosity Parameters Of the Two Micro-/ Mesoporous Po...mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In addition to Stern–Volmer coefficients, the limit of detection (LOD) values for both polymers and the five pesticides were calculated from the equation LOD = 3σ/ K SV , in which σ refers to the standard intensity deviation . As shown in Table , the LOD of PAN-TPE-1 for IDP reaches 28 ppb, which is much lower than the previously reported porous materials such as carbazole-based POPs (0.71 ppm) and Tb-MOF (3.32 ppm) . Moreover, the LOD value of 28 ppb is far below the allowed residue limits by the World Health Organization for IDP in common fruits and vegetables like tomatoes (0.5 ppm), blueberries (5 ppm), citrus fruits (1 ppm), beans (2 ppm), and land cress (6 ppm)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…4 As shown in Table 1, the LOD of PAN-TPE-1 for IDP reaches 28 ppb, which is much lower than the previously reported porous materials such as carbazole-based POPs (0.71 ppm) 2 and Tb-MOF (3.32 ppm). 44 Moreover, the LOD value of 28 ppb is far below the allowed residue limits by the World Health Organization for IDP in common fruits and vegetables like tomatoes (0.5 ppm), blueberries (5 ppm), citrus fruits (1 ppm), beans (2 ppm), and land cress (6 ppm). 45 Structure−Property Relationships.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%