Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1992
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.1992.183311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomy of software visualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Viewing by itself is the most passive of the forms of engagement; indeed, aside from controlling a visualization's execution and changing views, viewing does not entail active involvement with a visualization. Note that, in its broadest sense [49,50], visualization includes auralization; thus, we include "hearing" within this category.…”
Section: Engagement Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viewing by itself is the most passive of the forms of engagement; indeed, aside from controlling a visualization's execution and changing views, viewing does not entail active involvement with a visualization. Note that, in its broadest sense [49,50], visualization includes auralization; thus, we include "hearing" within this category.…”
Section: Engagement Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other visualization projects have been tried among younger learners but instead of AV, these systems employed program visualization (PV). AV and PV are considered distinct as the former deals more with the abstract descriptions of programs or algorithms while the latter aims to improve understanding of actual program implementation (Price, Baecker, & Small, 1998).…”
Section: Overview Of History Of Avmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Software visualization employs visual paradigms (visual resources, graphic design or animation) to facilitate both the human understanding and effective use of software (Price et al 1998). Software visualization tools are also based on metrics.…”
Section: Tool Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%