A Taxonomy of e-Healthcare Techniques and Solutions: Challenges and Future Directions

Arora, Dev; Dua, Amit; Ayub, Umair

doi:10.1201/9781003246688-3

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, integrating XAI tools into healthcare systems has shown effectiveness in various areas, including clinical decision-making, patient care, trust building, and risk reduction. By providing transparency and interpretability, XAI tools have facilitated a better understanding of AI models' decision-making processes, enabling healthcare professionals to make informed decisions, tailor treatment, and enhance patient trust and engagement [77]. Moreover, XAI tools have been instrumental in reducing potential risks and errors in healthcare and ensuring the safety and reliability of AI-assisted healthcare services.…”

Section: B Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [77], a taxonomy of e-healthcare techniques was presented by dividing them into four groups: machine learning, privacy, cloud computing, and data analytics. This was complemented by a study by [78], who proposed a taxonomy related to federated learning (FL) with AI in healthcare, categorizing FL applications into resource management, securityaware FL, incentive FL, and tailored FL categories tailored to healthcare needs.…”

Section: ) Rq1mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Literature Review on Transparencyand Interpretability of AI models in Healthcare:Taxonomies, Tools, Techniques, Datasets, OpenResearch Challenges, and Future Trends

Shafik,

Hidayatullah,

Kalinaki

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increased utilization of disruptive health and biomedical informatics technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), has accelerated medical operations from patient-centered medical experience data management to simplified medical procedures in this generative era. As these technologies integrate into traditional approaches, they raise critical medical concerns, entailing transparency and interpretability of these AI models. This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) and presents an exhaustive review of the studies using data collection procedures and publicly available academic databases. 1837 articles published between 2014 and 2024 were obtained from eight popular academic databases: PubMed, ACM Library, Springer, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. A comprehensive screening process was used, and 148 articles were considered based on the relevance of the AI method to healthcare and biomedical. The studied studies demonstrate that the majority of medical people still find it complex to effectively explain the reasoning behind the decisions AI models make during biomedical experiments, leading to limited trust, biased decision-making, and unknown patient data safety. Model-agnostic strategies and explainable AI (XAI) frameworks are inspected, together with crucial datasets for training and assessment. The main challenges are AI model intricacy and regulatory compliance, while future trends highlight fairness and predisposition mitigation. Limited studies are focusing on improving AI openness, trust, and interpretability. Towards the end, it reveals that there is still a big research gap in descriptive explainable AI models in healthcare when integrating AI into clinical practice while maintaining ethical standards and patient-centric care.

show abstract

Section: B Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: ) Rq1mentioning

confidence: 99%