2023
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomic revision of the Sinopterus complex (Pterosauria, Tapejaridae) from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota, with the new genus Huaxiadraco

Abstract: Tapejarids are edentulous pterosaurs particularly abundant in the Chinese Jiufotang Formation, counting with over 10 described specimens and dozens of undescribed ones. A total of seven nominal tapejarid species (within two genera) have been proposed, though it is disputed how many of those are valid instead of sexual or ontogenetic morphs of fewer, or a single, species. However, detailed revisions of the matter are still lacking. In the present work, we provide a specimen-level survey of anatomical variation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The allometric growth patterns ( figure 2 and table 1 ; electronic supplementary material, table S1) recovered by our multivariate approach are consistent with previous reports of allometry that used bivariate methods. These reports conclude that: (i) the ontogeny of Rhamphorhynchus shows near-isometry in wingspan, negative allometry in humerus, radius and metacarpal IV and positive allometry in WP2–3 relative to body length [ 16 ]; (ii) large specimens of Pterodactylus have significantly longer necks and skulls, and the metacarpal IV and proximal wing phalanges show positive allometry relative to the antebrachium and to distal wing phalanges [ 15 ]; (iii) sinopterine pterosaurs share isometry in the ulna, metacarpal IV and WP1–2, and positive allometry in the femur [ 29 ]; and (iv) Pteranodon shows negative allometry in tibia relative to femur and positive allometry in metacarpal IV relative to radius/ulna and to WP1 [ 14 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The allometric growth patterns ( figure 2 and table 1 ; electronic supplementary material, table S1) recovered by our multivariate approach are consistent with previous reports of allometry that used bivariate methods. These reports conclude that: (i) the ontogeny of Rhamphorhynchus shows near-isometry in wingspan, negative allometry in humerus, radius and metacarpal IV and positive allometry in WP2–3 relative to body length [ 16 ]; (ii) large specimens of Pterodactylus have significantly longer necks and skulls, and the metacarpal IV and proximal wing phalanges show positive allometry relative to the antebrachium and to distal wing phalanges [ 15 ]; (iii) sinopterine pterosaurs share isometry in the ulna, metacarpal IV and WP1–2, and positive allometry in the femur [ 29 ]; and (iv) Pteranodon shows negative allometry in tibia relative to femur and positive allometry in metacarpal IV relative to radius/ulna and to WP1 [ 14 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of 13 key skeletal dimensions were collected for allometric analysis: 1, skull length; 2, neck length; 3, tail length; 4, humerus length; 5, ulna or radius length; 6, wing metacarpal length; 7-10, lengths of WP1-4, respectively; 11, femur length; 12, tibia length; 13, wingspan (= combined length of humerus + ulna/radius + metacarpal IV + WP1-4) × 2.1) [26]. Measurements of Rhamphorhynchus muensteri (sensu Bennett [27]), Pterodactylus antiquus (sensu Bennett [15] and Vidovic & Martill [28]), Sinopterus dongi (sensu Pêgas et al [29]) and Pteranodon (sensu Bennett [14]) were taken from Hone et al [16] (88 specimens), Wellnhofer [30] (22 specimens), Pêgas et al [29] (and references therein; 10 specimens) and Bennett [14,31] (59 specimens), respectively (see electronic supplementary material, data S1 for detailed measurements for each specimen). Measurements of Pteranodon include two species, Pteranodon sternbergi and Pteranodon longiceps, because they do not differ in their postcranial skeletal anatomy [14] and only postcranial measurements are included in this analysis.…”
Section: Materials and Methods (A) Allometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations