2019
DOI: 10.3897/zse.95.34958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A taxonomic review of the crab spider genus Sidymella (Araneae, Thomisidae) in the Neotropics

Abstract: Four Neotropical species of Sidymella Strand, 1942, S.furcillata Keyserling, 1880, S.longispina (Mello-Leitão, 1943), S.lucida (Keyserling, 1880), and S.kolpogaster (Lise, 1973) are redescribed from both sexes. The holotype of S.nigripes (Mello-Leitão, 1947) is lost and this taxon is considered a species inquierenda. Sidymellaobscura (Mello-Leitão, 1929), S.parallela (Mello-Leitão, 1929), and S.spinifera (Mello-Leitão, 1929) are all nomina dubia. Two new species are described: Sidymellaexcavatasp. nov. (males … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genus that gives name to the subfamily had its Australian species recently revised by Machado et al (2019b), but despite the recent efforts to better understand the morphology of Stephanopis O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869, our knowledge regarding the Neotropical and Andean species of the genus relies only on original descriptions. A similar scenario is observed for Sidymella Strand, 1942, which also had its diagnosis and description updated by Machado et al (2019a). However, in this case, only the Neotropical species were considered in the taxonomic work while the Australian ones remain in need of revision.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The genus that gives name to the subfamily had its Australian species recently revised by Machado et al (2019b), but despite the recent efforts to better understand the morphology of Stephanopis O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869, our knowledge regarding the Neotropical and Andean species of the genus relies only on original descriptions. A similar scenario is observed for Sidymella Strand, 1942, which also had its diagnosis and description updated by Machado et al (2019a). However, in this case, only the Neotropical species were considered in the taxonomic work while the Australian ones remain in need of revision.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The subfamily Stephanopinae has been the focus of recent revisional works (Benjamin 2013(Benjamin , 2015(Benjamin , 2016(Benjamin , 2017Machado et al 2015Machado et al , 2017Machado et al , 2018Machado et al , 2019aSilva-Moreira and Machado 2016;Prado et al 2018). Even so, most of its component genera are still poorly known and diagnosed, which is reflected in the lack of resolution and constant recovery of its polyphyletic relations (Benjamin et al 2008;Benjamin 2011;Wheeler et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphological aspects and taxonomic boundaries of Neotropical stephanopines have been extensively studied during the past years (Machado et al 2015(Machado et al , 2018(Machado et al , 2019aSilva-Moreira & Machado 2016). Meanwhile, phylogenies based on morphological and molecular data were congruent in recovering some close related genera, corroborating classic propositions for the possible existence of tribes or even certain "groups" in this subfamily (Benjamin 2011;Benjamin et al 2008;Wheeler et al 2017;Machado et al 2017Machado et al , 2019bMachado & Teixeira 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Existen diversos trabajos orientados a redescribir y escribir diferentes especies de tomísidos y a resolver las relaciones filogenéticas intragrupo. Al respecto se puede citar a Benjamin et al (2008); Benjamin (2011Benjamin ( , 2013Benjamin ( , 2015Benjamin ( , 2017; Sirvid et al (2013); Silva-Moreira y Machado (2016); Machado et al (2019aMachado et al ( , 2019bMachado et al ( , 2019c; Grismado y Achitte-Schmutzler (2020) y Machado y Texeira (2021) entre otros. Los conocimientos acerca de su ecología, taxonomía y diversidad aún son incipientes en Argentina, actualmente se conocen 60 especies (CAA c2018) mientras que a nivel mundial se registran 2160 especies de Thomisidae (WSC c2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified