2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3426658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Targeted Multi-Omic Analysis Approach Measures Protein Expression and Low Abundance Transcripts on the Single Cell Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6000 reads/cell) was insufficient to reveal the complete spectrum of CD127 and CD25 expression, resulting in reduced power to fully resolve CD25 low/int T cells, when compared to flow cytometry. Although increased sequencing coverages in our experiment would provide only minimal gain for the functional characterisation of single cells and clustering, they are necessary to describe the complete dynamic range of protein expression, especially for highly expressed proteins such as CD127 and CD25, thereby leading to similar sensitivity between molecular flow cytometry, as previously demonstrated for CITE-seq [9], REAP-seq [10] and BD AbSeq [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6000 reads/cell) was insufficient to reveal the complete spectrum of CD127 and CD25 expression, resulting in reduced power to fully resolve CD25 low/int T cells, when compared to flow cytometry. Although increased sequencing coverages in our experiment would provide only minimal gain for the functional characterisation of single cells and clustering, they are necessary to describe the complete dynamic range of protein expression, especially for highly expressed proteins such as CD127 and CD25, thereby leading to similar sensitivity between molecular flow cytometry, as previously demonstrated for CITE-seq [9], REAP-seq [10] and BD AbSeq [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We flow-sorted naïve CD4 + T-cells from a healthy adult donor and polarized these cells using standard cytokine combinations (Cano-Gamez et al, 2020) in combination with fecal waters (1:100 dilution) collected from newborns fed B. infantis EVC001 or control children lacking B. infantis ( Figure 6A). To evaluate the polarization and cellular states of the T-cells in the cultures we applied a targeted multiomics approach (Rhapsody, BD Biosciences) in which we combined the analysis of 259 mRNA by targeted sc-mRNA-sequencing and 10 proteins using oligo-coupled antibodies (BD Abseq , BD Biosciences) (Mair et al, 2020). In this way we were able to assess transcription factor and cytokine gene expression often more difficult to detect in untargeted sc-mRNA-sequencing applications, and although the overall UMAP distribution of cells is similar across conditions, subtle differences in cell states were observed ( Figure 6B).…”
Section: B Infantis Evc001 Metabolites Influence T-cell Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1; Experimental Methods). Donors were selected based on the diversity of blood types (e.g., A, B, O, and Rhesus factor +/-) and PBMC samples were tagged with donor-specific MULTI-seq 2 and Cell Hashing DNA barcodes (BD Biosciences) 14 . PBMCs were mixed for 30 minutes at 4°C prior to emulsion across four droplet microfluidics lanes (10x Genomics) at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By avoiding the usual requirement for processing distinct samples individually, these technologies increase scRNA-seq cell and sample throughput while minimizing technical confounders (e.g., doublets and batch effects). Two main types of sample multiplexing approaches have been described: (i) in silico genotyping using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and (ii) tagging cell membranes with sample-specific DNA barcodes using lipid-modified oligonucleotides (LMOs; e.g., MULTI-seq) 2 or DNAconjugated antibodies 3,4 (e.g., BD single-cell multiplexing kit (SCMK) 9 ). Despite the increasing popularity of sample multiplexing, direct measures of transcriptional changes induced by mixing human samples from different individuals during scRNA-seq sample preparation have not been performed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%