2020
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.5784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tandem ionic liquid‐based dispersive microextraction method using in‐syringe air‐assisted vesicle system for rapid determination of lead and cadmium in artificial sweat extract of facial cosmetic products

Abstract: In the present study an innovative tandem ionic liquid‐based dispersive microextraction method using an in‐syringe air‐assisted vesicle system was developed to determine the ultra‐trace levels of lead (PbII) and cadmium (CdII) ions in synthetic sweat extract of branded and nonbranded facial cosmetic products. This method is based on injecting 2‐amino‐3‐sulfhydrylpropanoic acid (l‐cysteine) (as an eco‐friendly chelating agent), hexafluorophosphate ion [PF6−] (as an ion pair agent) and 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazoliu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recovery of 97.84–102.36% from the MD-μ-SPE was better than that of other extraction methods. A further comparison of the developed method with the existing methods indicated that the RSDs were similar to those of the tandem ionic liquid–based dispersive microextraction method using a syringe air–assisted vesicle system (TIL-DμE-ISAVS) method 55 and higher than those of DLLME, 56 M-SPE 57 and SPE 58 methods. Moreover, the methods using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) 56,59 for analyte extraction do not report reusability tests; but in the MD-μ-SPE method, the sorbent is reusable (up to eight cycles).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A recovery of 97.84–102.36% from the MD-μ-SPE was better than that of other extraction methods. A further comparison of the developed method with the existing methods indicated that the RSDs were similar to those of the tandem ionic liquid–based dispersive microextraction method using a syringe air–assisted vesicle system (TIL-DμE-ISAVS) method 55 and higher than those of DLLME, 56 M-SPE 57 and SPE 58 methods. Moreover, the methods using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) 56,59 for analyte extraction do not report reusability tests; but in the MD-μ-SPE method, the sorbent is reusable (up to eight cycles).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although the content of HMs in daily facial cosmetics has been measured in several investigations (Supporting Information, Table S6), only a few studies have assessed the bioaccessibility of HMs in cosmetics resulting from dermal contact. For example, the bioaccessibility of Cr in eyeshadows was 0.01%, while that of Cr and Pb in face powder was undetectable, , and the IVBA dermal of Pb in foundation cream was similar to that in face paints incubated in the dark. It was difficult for HMs in other non-facial products that may still come into contact with human skin to migrate into sweat, such as ceramics and alloys with high content of Cr .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hazardous heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, mercury, chromium, and iron have been identified in various personal care products, including lip balms, teeth whitening products, eyeliners, and nail polish (Ackah, 2015; Alam et al, 2019; Karimi and Ziarati, 2015; Ouremi and Ayodele, 2014). The use of cadmium and lead in cosmetics is currently being studied due to their potential neurological and carcinogenic effects on humans (Lead is IARC Group 2A, and cadmium is Group 1) (Akhtar et al, 2020; Järup, 2003). Lead toxicity may result in anemia, colic, neuropathy, nephropathy, and infertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%