A tale of two crises: the Belgian and Irish dioxin contamination incidents

Abstract

Purpose -This paper aims to provide a focused overview of two dioxin incidents, with particular emphasis on regulatory successes and failures and their respective causes. The paper seeks to adopt a comparative approach to the case studies, with considerable use made of primary sources such as parliamentary debate, government reports and EC legislation. Design/methodology/approach -The paper is a review of the strengths and weaknesses in the management of the Belgian and Irish dioxin contanimation incidents. Findings -It is concluded that open, transparent and decisive risk management, based on robust risk assessment, is paramount in ensuring confidence in both the food supply chain and, in the feed and food safety regulatory process. It is also concluded that the 2008 Irish dioxin incident tested the reforms prompted by previous food scares. Practical implications -It is important that the lessons from these two incidents are learnt if they are not to be repeated in other jurisdictions. Originality/value -This is the first academic study of the 2008 Irish dioxin incident, one of the most significant recent food scares in the European Communities. The incident emphasises the vital role of open, transparent and decisive decision making in managing risk. In addition, through a comparative analysis of the Belgian and Irish incidents, the utility of the reforms prompted by previous food scares is demonstrated. In particular, the study highlights the important role played by the European Food Safety Authority in one of its first major tests as a risk assessor and risk communicator.

Invited review: The economic impact and control of paratuberculosis in cattle

“…If a link between Johne's disease in ruminants and Crohn's disease in humans is established, significant economic losses might be expected, particularly for the dairy industry, due to consumers' fears (Groenendaal and Zagmutt, 2008). Effective communication of food safety assurance programs to consumers seems crucial to ensure and maintain trust in the safety of foods (Mazzocchi et al, 2004(Mazzocchi et al, , 2008Casey et al, 2010). In fact, food safety is an important concern for consumers in different areas of the world.…”

Halal Meat Fraud and Safety Issues in the UK: a Review in the Context of the European Union

“…These incidents of food fraud and food safety are not by any means restricted to the Halal meat industry. In Belgium and Ireland, the introduction of dioxin into the human food chain through the use of contaminated fat in animal feed (Casey et al 2010) is still fresh in the minds of many Belgian and Irish consumers. Tahkapaa et al (2015) suggested that these incidents might have prompted the adoption of EU Regulation 178/2002 in the EU.…”

Fundamentals in Management of Food Safety in the Industrial Setting

“…The weaker the traceability, the larger the scale of the outbreak or product loss. This was demonstrated in the dioxin incident in Ireland where a full product recall was conducted for pork meat, whereas for beef meat it was possible to limit the recall to the contaminated product because after the BSE crisis, a traceability system was established for beef products (Casey et al 2010). Similarly, in the food manufacturing industry, the finer the traceability, e.g.…”