“…The anatomical and sociocultural implications of trauma in the past are complex and multidimensional; as such, the theoretical landscapes, research questions and methodological systems used to investigate skeletal injuries are diverse (Gilmour, Brickley, Jurriaans, & Prowse, 2019; Lovell, 1997; Redfern & Roberts, 2019). Palaeopathological studies of skeletal injury have made important contributions to the interpretation of biocultural contexts in the past, addressing issues such as interpersonal violence (Erdal & Erdal, 2012; Fernández‐Crespo, 2017; Pfeiffer, 2016; Piombino‐Mascali, Bedini, Curate, Lippi, & Mallegni, 2006), age and gender (Curate, Lopes, & Cunha, 2010; de la Cova, 2012; Ives, Mant, de la Cova, & Brickley, 2017; Robbins, Gray, Mushrif‐Tripathy, & Sankhyan, 2012), social inequality and structural violence (Antunes‐Ferreira, 2015; de la Cova, 2017, 2012, 2010; Fernandes, Liberato, Marques, & Cunha, 2017; Osterholtz, 2012), subsistence strategies (Domett & Tayles, 2006; Lambert & Welker, 2017), territorial organisation (Collier & Primeau, 2019; Šlaus, Novak, Bedić, & Strinović, 2012), child abuse (Gaither, 2012; Wheeler, Williams, Beauchesne, & Dupras, 2013), surgical procedures or medical assistance (Binder et al, 2016; Giuffra & Fornaciari, 2017) and the provision of care (Dequeker et al, 1997; Lovell, 2016).…”