2017
DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tale of Mexico's most exploited—and connected—watersheds: the Basin of Mexico and the Lerma‐Chapala Basin

Abstract: Water management policies and their impacts for both the Basin of Mexico and the Lerma-Chapala basin-where nearly 25% of Mexico's inhabitants are found-are described. This work shows that the prevailing water management policy has been the augmentation of water supply and neither policies have focused on water savings nor management of water demand. The effects of the large extraction rates on both basins have caused drying-up of streams due to drawdown rates that reach 2.5 m/year with an associated land subsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the differences found in the CONUS range from −40 cm to +150 cm 17 , with negative values on the U.S. east coast that increase westwards, reaching their maximum values www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/ www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/ on the Rockies. It should be mentioned that the differences used in this work are static-as both NGVD29 and NAVD88 are-and that the effects of seismic uplift or subsidence caused by heavy groundwater extraction in central Mexico 31 are not considered.…”
Section: Surface Transformation Between H Ngvd29 and H Navd88 (δH 882mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the differences found in the CONUS range from −40 cm to +150 cm 17 , with negative values on the U.S. east coast that increase westwards, reaching their maximum values www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/ www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/ on the Rockies. It should be mentioned that the differences used in this work are static-as both NGVD29 and NAVD88 are-and that the effects of seismic uplift or subsidence caused by heavy groundwater extraction in central Mexico 31 are not considered.…”
Section: Surface Transformation Between H Ngvd29 and H Navd88 (δH 882mentioning
confidence: 99%