The advent of the neoconstructivist avant-gardes in Brazil during the midtwentieth century has become consolidated as a local art historical canon. As always, canonization takes place at the expense of the complexities and even contradictions of those movements and artists it celebrates. The denomination "local canon" may itself be misleading, for in this particular case it has been to a large extent legitimized internationally through the projection, reception, and collection of Brazilian art abroad. More problematic still is the association between locale and a particular form of discourse, one that is seen to belong to the character and "temper" of a particular place. Nowhere is this more explicitly affirmed than in the so-called rift between paulistas (São Paulo natives) and cariocas (Rio de Janeiro natives), through art critical discourse pertaining to the concrete and neoconcrete movements. The association between place and "artistic temper," particularly when viewed from the "outside," becomes therefore all the more problematic. Writing from such a position and, precisely because of this, aware of the dangers of essentializing such production, I explore in this essay some of the inconsistencies within the respective discourses in order to open new avenues for debate and (art) historical understanding. This is therefore not a grand historical survey but a brief investigation into certain discrepancies that were already present within contemporaneous critical discourse, intent to escape the somewhat reductive light to which such movements have become exposed.