A tale of dual-approach construct validation and reliability testing for a Zika infection awareness knowledge questionnaire

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to validate the English version of a WHO-adapted questionnaire: Zika infection awareness/knowledge questionnaire using a unique dual-approach validation model.Design/methodology/approachA cross-sectional pilot study of 30 adult respondents in Malaysia completed the self-administered questionnaire on knowledge and perception to Zika infection. Construct validity was assessed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of SPSS and Rasch partial credit. Reliability is tested using pKR20 and Cronbach’s alpha.FindingsKnowledge construct was unidimensional, good model fit, easy to endorse and well discriminative. Five-rating Likert scale for perception domain was appropriate. Knowledge domain should be separated into 6 level of difficulties. Perception domain should remain as one construct. Knowledge domain was highly reliability (pKR20 = 0.96), perception domain was fairly reliable (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.641). Respondent's ability to answer knowledge domain and perception domain were separated into 3 and 4 levels.Research limitations/implicationsSmall sample size may affect factor analysis.Practical implicationsThe questionnaire has good psychometric properties to measure the knowledge and perception of Zika infection among Malaysian community.Social implicationsThe questionnaire helped to gauge knowledge and perception of the general community in Malaysia to aid preparation of health education tool for Zika infection.Originality/valueThis paper validated questionnaire with two biostatistical software programs in bidirectional approach – items difficulty and respondents' ability – is the first field test of WHO questionnaire among general population in Southeast Asia.

The Malay-Version Knowledge, Risk Perception, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire on Heatwaves: Development and Construct Validation

“…However, the internal consistency was lower than that of several previous studies performed outside Malaysia. This may be caused by several factors such as the online distribution of the questionnaire and the number of respondents [ 57 ]. In the present study, the only means of distributing the questionnaire was via online platforms.…”