Å ta empirien på alvor – Er forskningsbasert kunnskap relevant for systemiske familiebehandlere?

Solem, May‐Britt; Thuen, Frode; Tilden, Terje

doi:10.18261/issn0807-7487-2008-02-03

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since our premise in this article is EBP (APA, 2006; Norwegian Psychological Association, 2007), we find this in agreement with interactive constructivism and critical realism (Solem et al., 2008). For example, it is argued that one of several common factors is that the clinician should keep up to date on professional developments, including research evidence (Tilden & Vrabel, 2021).…”

Section: We Need Critical Realism In Systemic Practicesupporting

confidence: 80%

“…This also means that, in knowledge production, including research, regardless of the design, we cannot reliably claim an objective truth. Knowledge in social sciences is impermanent and will always be replaced by up-to-date findings that refute, confirm, expand or nuance previous results (Solem et al, 2008). Nevertheless, research has the advantage of being a form of systematised knowledge production that is subject to strict criteria for methodological compliance, critique, verifiability and transparency.…”

Section: Interactive Constructivism and Critical Realismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, it may risk losing legitimacy, recognition and status for its area of expertise. This is a concern that was described already in the 2008 article:

‘The consequence may be that systemic family therapy is marginalised from the outside (for example, where granting authorities will not be able to see that this form of therapy meets the requirements for evidence‐based knowledge), and that it is depleted from within (in that research‐based empirical data as an important component is not provided with the mutually enriching interaction with practice and theory in knowledge generation)’ (Solem et al., 2008, p. 90).…”

Section: Clarification Of Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Taking empirical evidence seriously v.2.0¹

Tilden,

Solem,

Thuen

et al. 2024

Journal of Family Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the status and challenges related to the basic perspective of knowledge and science in systemic practice. This article points out that some parts of the field (i.e. collaborative dialogical practice) have a preference for knowledge obtained through qualitative rather than quantitative studies. This is problematised, partly based on methodology and partly on the bias this entails in the provision of knowledge to students and systemic practitioners. The consequences of such a preference may be that systemic practitioners will lack significant knowledge, and that they are not encouraged to conduct or participate in quantitative studies. This issue highlights a stronger focus on the field's basic perspectives, as well as key political, ethical and professional policies. In response, the article presents the theories of interactive constructivism and critical realism and proposes that these become the guiding paradigm for systemic practice.

show abstract

Section: We Need Critical Realism In Systemic Practicesupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Interactive Constructivism and Critical Realismmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, it may risk losing legitimacy, recognition and status for its area of expertise. This is a concern that was described already in the 2008 article:

Section: Clarification Of Conceptsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation