2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systems neurophysiology approach to voluntary event coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
86
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
15
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen as the suppression of the inhibitory effect of the n-1 trial on the n-2 trial. The knowledge system is thought to be a storage system, which includes procedural and implicit-perceptual knowledge (Klimesch, 2011;Petruo, Stock, Münchau, & Beste, 2016) important during cognitive flexibility . The P1 ERP-component is assumed to represent mechanisms related to the suppression of information in task irrelevant networks during early categorization thereby controlling access to information stored in a knowledge system (Klimesch, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen as the suppression of the inhibitory effect of the n-1 trial on the n-2 trial. The knowledge system is thought to be a storage system, which includes procedural and implicit-perceptual knowledge (Klimesch, 2011;Petruo, Stock, Münchau, & Beste, 2016) important during cognitive flexibility . The P1 ERP-component is assumed to represent mechanisms related to the suppression of information in task irrelevant networks during early categorization thereby controlling access to information stored in a knowledge system (Klimesch, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later studies have provided evidence that this effect is due to the fact that (a) the co-occurrence of stimulus and response features leads to the binding of the respective feature codes into the so-called event files (Hommel 2004), which are then (b) retrieved whenever at least one of the features is repeated (Beste et al 2016; Colzato et al 2005; Keizer et al 2008; Frings et al 2007; Kühn et al 2011; Moeller and Frings 2014; Petruo et al 2016). The binding part of this scenario seems to be rather immune to all sorts of attentional and instructional variation, while the retrieval part is systematically affected by the degree to which a particular stimulus dimension is attended (e.g., Hommel 2004, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that during the acquisition phase, the readiness potential (RP) (e.g., Shibasaki and Hallett, 2006) component, which is a slow, negative going potential prior to an action execution that reflects the general preparation of voluntary movement, was more negative under intention-based conditions, but the P3 component—a positive potential observed approximately 300 ms after the stimulus presentation that reflects the formation of a link between stimulus evaluation and response selection (e.g., Petruo et al, 2016) —was more positive under stimulus-based conditions. However, the ERP mode was not included during the test phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%