A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context

Abstract

To address sustainable development goals (SDGs), national and international strategies have been increasingly interested in the bioeconomy. SDGs have been criticized for lacking stakeholder perspectives and agency, and for requiring too little of business. There is also a lack of both systematic and systemic frameworks for the strategic planning of bioeconomy transitions. Using a systems engineering approach, we seek to address this with a process framework to bridge bioeconomy transitions by addressing SDGs. In this methodology paper, we develop a systems archetype mapping framework for sustainable bioeconomy transitions, called MPAST: Mapping Problem Archetypes to Solutions for Transitions. Using this framework with sector-specific stakeholder data facilitates the establishment of the start (problem state) and end (solution state) to understand and analyze sectorial transitions to the bioeconomy. We apply the MPAST framework to the case of a Norwegian agricultural bioeconomy transition, using data from a survey of the Norwegian agricultural sector on transitioning to a bioeconomy. The results of using this framework illustrate how visual mapping methods can be combined as a process, which we then discuss in the context of SDG implementation.

The Crossovers and Connectivity between Systems Engineering and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Scoping Study

“…Second, systems engineering has the potential to significantly contribute to the evaluation of socio-technical systems [28][29][30]. For instance, Palmer et al [31] used systems engineering to develop a framework for a systematic and systemic mapping of bioeconomic transitions within and between socio-technical systems. The conceptualization of bioeconomy transitions naturally leads itself towards systems engineering, as systems engineering offers a socio-technical perspective.…”

HoReCa Food Waste and Sustainable Development Goals—A Systemic View

“…In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review and used a systems engineering approach by applying systems thinking to these results in the context of the SDGs. The SDGs act as a large system made up of smaller systems [75], i.e., a system of systems. Recent critiques of the SDGs highlight the importance of these interdependencies.…”

Developing a Participatory Planning Support System for Sustainable Regional Planning—A Problem Structuring Case Study

“…The acronym is built on the steps of the methodology, which encompasses defining and analyzing stakeholders, problems, alternatives, decision-making, and continuous evaluation. The methodology has been applied in multiple problem-solving efforts, with recent examples from applications to support bioeconomy transitions [26] and digital twin development of offshore cranes [27]. In [28], SPADE is used to develop a problem structure for marine emission reduction technology acquisitions.…”