2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2012.02.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic study on the effect of histidine position and fragment ion size on the formation of bn ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the peak width of the later AT profile (which is generated from the additive sum of three individual IM profiles, as discussed in detail below) is much broader than the early AT conformer (which corresponds to a single isomer). 76 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the peak width of the later AT profile (which is generated from the additive sum of three individual IM profiles, as discussed in detail below) is much broader than the early AT conformer (which corresponds to a single isomer). 76 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Raw data" peak width measurement is included in the software to emulate manual measurement of peak widths for comparison purposes. "Gaussian fitted" first fits the mobility data to a Gaussian distribution, such as previously reported [44], and returns two values, µ (i.e., peak centroid or AT) and σ (i.e., standard deviation), where σ is subsequently used to calculate the FWHH using equation 1 [50]:…”
Section: Im_fit Graphical User Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each of the aforementioned techniques can facilitate characterization of IMunresolved species (i.e., ions with similar CCSs), most approaches [37,[39][40][41][42][43] require isolation and subsequent fragmentation of ions at m/z values that are suspected to correspond to multiple IM-unresolved components. Previously, we showed that plots of IM profiles' full widths at halfheights (FWHHs) vs IM arrival times (ATs) could be used to determine peak purity [44]. The original technique, however, was time consuming because FWHH and AT for each IM profile had to be manually measured and plotted, therefore reducing the method's utility for highthroughput analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ESI experiments, ions were generated using an Analytica ESI source (Analytica of Branford, Inc., Branford, CT, USA) equipped with an in‐house‐built spraying setup . The ion spray was generated by applying ~4 kV (with respect to ground) on the stainless steel needle of a 100‐μL SGE syringe (SGE Inc., Austin, TX, USA).…”
Section: Experimental and Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 99%