1977
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(77)90431-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic study of (n, p) reactions at 14.7 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
72
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
16
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present measurements also agree well with the measurements of Pu et al [8] and Qaim et al [20] around 14 MeV while that of Vinitskaya et al [21] is somewhat low, though overlapping with the present measurements within the quoted uncertainty. The measured cross-section of the 75 As(n, 2n) 74 As reaction from the present work is lower than the available literature data at lower energies.…”
Section: A Comparison With Literature Data and Evaluationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present measurements also agree well with the measurements of Pu et al [8] and Qaim et al [20] around 14 MeV while that of Vinitskaya et al [21] is somewhat low, though overlapping with the present measurements within the quoted uncertainty. The measured cross-section of the 75 As(n, 2n) 74 As reaction from the present work is lower than the available literature data at lower energies.…”
Section: A Comparison With Literature Data and Evaluationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is particularly evident for 98,100 Mo which exhibit larger PE contributions than 92 Mo, in agreement with the isotope effect (see, e.g., [84,85]). A comparison between the two approaches shows that the local approach is much better tuned to describe the excitation curves than the global approach.…”
Section: -15supporting
confidence: 77%
“…At higher energies, the results of Nesaraja et al [6] are larger than the present work, and with substantial uncertainties. The present measurements also agree well with the measurements of Pu et al [7] and Qaim et al [8] around 14 MeV while that of Vinitskaya et al [9] is somewhat low, though overlapping with the present measurements, within the quoted uncertainty.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%