2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07218-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of pedicle screw electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, currents up to 18 mA may be used without the risk of reaching the maximum 400 V compliance voltage of devices such as the Digitimer DS7A (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). This may not even be necessary, as current evidence suggests that stimulation currents below 10 mA have a higher diagnostic odds ratio [5]. The experimental results also demonstrate that the total resistance of the pedicle screws, even those with a larger theoretical TiO 2 layer thickness, do not have a high enough electrical resistance to compromise the compliance of the electrical stimulator.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, currents up to 18 mA may be used without the risk of reaching the maximum 400 V compliance voltage of devices such as the Digitimer DS7A (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK). This may not even be necessary, as current evidence suggests that stimulation currents below 10 mA have a higher diagnostic odds ratio [5]. The experimental results also demonstrate that the total resistance of the pedicle screws, even those with a larger theoretical TiO 2 layer thickness, do not have a high enough electrical resistance to compromise the compliance of the electrical stimulator.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Ideally, this method would enable the verification of the goodness of pedicle screw insertion without the need for imaging confirmation. However, current evidence has demonstrated a low sensitivity and high specificity of tEMG [5], indicating a high rate of false negatives. Anderson et al [6] suggested that this could be related to high pedicle screw resistance, which led researchers to investigate pedicle screws' electrical properties in uni-and polyaxial titanium screws [6][7][8][9], as well as in those coated with hydroxyapatite [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%