2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.08.20190553
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on improving implementation of the revitalised integrated disease surveillance and response system in the African region: a health workers’ perspective

Abstract: Background: The revised integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR) guidelines adopted by African member states in 2010 aimed at strengthening surveillance systems critical capacities. Milestones achieved through IDSR strategy implementation prior to adopting the revised guidelines are well documented, however, there is a dearth of knowledge on the progress made post-adoption. This study aimed to review key recommendations resulting from surveillance assessment studies to improve implementation of the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This survey approach involved an assessment of participants' opinions towards reaching group consensus. Utilisation of the Delphi process enabled practical assessment regarding the importance and feasibility of implementing generalised recommendations to improve surveillance systems derived from an initial systematic review of studies conducted in the African region and further disease-speci c recommendations derived from primary studies conducted in NTD endemic regions in Kenya [16][17][18]. By combining the opinions and perspectives of key stakeholders, the survey described consensus reached on the most feasible recommendations for implementation to improve surveillance and response to NTDs at the sub-national level in Kenya.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This survey approach involved an assessment of participants' opinions towards reaching group consensus. Utilisation of the Delphi process enabled practical assessment regarding the importance and feasibility of implementing generalised recommendations to improve surveillance systems derived from an initial systematic review of studies conducted in the African region and further disease-speci c recommendations derived from primary studies conducted in NTD endemic regions in Kenya [16][17][18]. By combining the opinions and perspectives of key stakeholders, the survey described consensus reached on the most feasible recommendations for implementation to improve surveillance and response to NTDs at the sub-national level in Kenya.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-round descriptive web-based Delphi survey was utilised. The factors assessed in the survey were retrieved from key ndings of three previous studies [16][17][18]. The rst study involved a systematic review of literature based on surveillance assessment studies, which identi ed priority recommendations for implementation to improve surveillance system core, support and attribute functions in the African region (PROSPERO Registration number CRD42019124108) [16].…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations