2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-244x-14-139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review on improving cognition in schizophrenia: which is the more commonly used type of training, practice or strategy learning?

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this article was to conduct a review of the types of training offered to people with schizophrenia in order to help them develop strategies to cope with or compensate for neurocognitive or sociocognitive deficits.MethodsWe conducted a search of the literature using keywords such as “schizophrenia”, “training”, and “cognition” with the most popular databases of peer-reviewed journals.ResultsWe reviewed 99 controlled studies in total (though nine did not have a control condition). We fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data focus on verbal learning and reflect the heterogeneity of skill acquisition during CR, a small portion of which can be predicted by static, historical, and dynamic factors (Boosman et al, 2014; Cella et al, 2015; Medalia and Choi, 2009; Radhakrishnan et al, 2015). In light of present results, one might speculate that a participant with high static verbal learning may not benefit from additional compensatory training in this domain (Paquin et al, 2014; Scheu et al, 2013). On the other hand, low static verbal learning along with flat or negative scores on the present learning potential assessment might indicate cognitive impairment involving both the primary substrates of verbal learning as well as frontally-mediated executive abilities that are recruited by the compensatory strategy (i.e., semantic clustering), suggesting a different profile of impairment from individuals with low initial verbal learning whose performance does improve following strategy training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The present data focus on verbal learning and reflect the heterogeneity of skill acquisition during CR, a small portion of which can be predicted by static, historical, and dynamic factors (Boosman et al, 2014; Cella et al, 2015; Medalia and Choi, 2009; Radhakrishnan et al, 2015). In light of present results, one might speculate that a participant with high static verbal learning may not benefit from additional compensatory training in this domain (Paquin et al, 2014; Scheu et al, 2013). On the other hand, low static verbal learning along with flat or negative scores on the present learning potential assessment might indicate cognitive impairment involving both the primary substrates of verbal learning as well as frontally-mediated executive abilities that are recruited by the compensatory strategy (i.e., semantic clustering), suggesting a different profile of impairment from individuals with low initial verbal learning whose performance does improve following strategy training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this regard, Paquin et al, [27] in their study posited that compared to social stimulation, socio-cognitive training with the help of family members can improve the quality of life, social functioning and social cognitive skills of schizophrenic patients. Since schizophrenia is a mental disorder that requires rehabilitation, the treatment of its victims has enormous implications that are evident in the extent of its positive and negative symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical presentation is heterogeneous, including positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms, ultimately leading to significant disease‐related disability (Mueser & McGurk, ). Cognitive impairments are considered to be core features of SCZ and main predictors of poor functional outcome, whereas deficits in emotion processing interfere with intrapersonal and interpersonal functions and underlie negative symptoms, such as apathy and anhedonia (Kring & Elis, ; Paquin, Wilson, Cellard, Lecomte, & Potvin, ; Trémeau, ). Although its etiology and pathogenesis are still unknown, evidence suggests that SCZ is a neurodevelopmental disorder and several functional neuroimaging studies found abnormalities in brain activity in these patients during cognitive, executive, and emotional tasks (Delvecchio, Sugranyes, & Frangou, ; Harrison, Lewis, & Kleinman, ; Mwansisya et al, ; Ross, Margolis, Reading, Pletnikov, & Coyle, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%