A systematic review of video‐modelling interventions for children and adolescents with attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder

Wilkes‐Gillan, Sarah; Cordier, Reinie; Chen, Yu Wei; Swanton, Ruth; Mahoney, Natasha; Trimboli, Concettina; Yule, Elisa; Tam, Elaine

doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12747

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When examining the efficacy of cognitive behavioral interventions on ADHD and externalizing behaviors, Riise et al ( 2021 ) found large but comparably smaller effects for ADHD than externalizing behaviors in a moderate to high quality study. Furthermore, Wilkes-Gillan et al ( 2021 ) investigated video-modelling as an intervention technique for behavior change in ADHD. In this low/moderate quality review, Wilkes-Gillan et al ( 2021 ) found overall improvements in social targets, such as social skills and friendship quality.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, Wilkes-Gillan et al ( 2021 ) investigated video-modelling as an intervention technique for behavior change in ADHD. In this low/moderate quality review, Wilkes-Gillan et al ( 2021 ) found overall improvements in social targets, such as social skills and friendship quality. Pauli-Pott et al ( 2021 ) found in a high-quality meta-analysis that cognitive interventions targeting executive functioning led to positive outcomes on ADHD and ODD symptoms with small to moderate effect sizes in children with this dual diagnosis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Magnitude of effect: unclear. Dose response: N/A Vacher et al, ( 2020 ) Moderate Risk of bias: some lack of randomization, small sample sizes reduce power; Precision: moderate; heterogeneity of outcome measures across studies; consistently related to ADHD outcomes; Publication bias: not ascertained; Magnitude of effect: fairly strong; Dose response: N/A Van der Oord et al, ( 2008 ) High Risk of bias: low as all RCTs; Precision: large effect sizes observed across multiple combination studies (pharma/non-pharma/combined); Intervention directly related to outcome/population of interest; Publication bias: fail-safe N’s were substantial, low risk of bias; Magnitude of effect: mostly strong; Dose response: N/A Vekety et al, ( 2021 ) Moderate Risk of bias: some lack of randomization/blinding; Precision: small to medium effect sizes observed; the overall effect was significant and moderate when the informants were teachers, but when parents or the children themselves rated their own behavior, the effects were non-significant; Publication bias: Egger’s regression test and funnel plot supported the absence of publication bias; Magnitude of effect: small to medium; Dose response: N/A Wilkes-Gillan et al, ( 2021 ) Low/Moderate Risk of bias: some lack of randomization/blinding and confounding bias, but methodological quality mostly strong; Precision: findings from this review are preliminary in nature, medium to large effect sizes observed in two studies and one study reported large effect size, overall effect sizes not clearly reported; Publication bias: not ascertained; Magnitude of effect: moderate; Dose response: N/A Willis et al, ( 2019 ) Moderate Risk of bias: some lack of randomization, small sample sizes reduce power; Precision: some meaningful precision; Consistent and directly related to ADHD outcomes; Publication bias: not ascertained; Magnitude of effect: fairly strong; Dose response: N/A Zwi et al, ( 2011 ) Moderate Risk of bias: low as all RCTs; Precision: large effect sizes observed (9/11 studies); Consistent across studies; Intervention directly related to outcome of interest; Publication bias: not ascertained; Magnitude of effect: mostly strong; Dose response: N/A; Interventions effects maintained in 9 studies at 1-year follow-up Anxiety Ale et al, ( 2015 ) Moderate Risk of bias: low due to RCTs; Precision: small ...…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interventions for Young Children’s Mental Health: A Review of Reviews

Hudson,

Minihan,

Chen

et al. 2023

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To determine the efficacy of intervention programs for young children (4–9 years) with emerging mental health needs, we conducted a review of meta-analytic and systematic reviews of the intervention literature. Of 41,061 abstracts identified and 15,076 screened, 152 review articles met the inclusion criteria. We reviewed interventions across multiple disciplines targeting: (1) general mental health concerns; (2) internalizing symptoms; (3) externalizing symptoms; (4) anxiety; (5) depression; (6) trauma; (7) symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; and (8) mental health concerns associated with autism spectrum disorder. Substantial evidence was found for the efficacy of behavioral and cognitive behavioral interventions for general mental health concerns, externalizing symptoms (generally, as well as ADHD, conduct, and other behavioral symptoms) and internalizing symptoms (generally, as well as anxiety) aged 4–9 years. Emerging evidence was identified for interventions targeting trauma symptoms, depression symptoms, and social, emotional and behavioral symptoms in autism spectrum disorder in children aged 4–9 years. Currently there is only limited emerging evidence regarding non-behavioral or non-cognitive behavioral interventions for programs targeting children ages 4–9 years where the aim is to deliver an evidence-based program to improve child social, emotional and/or behavioral functioning. Given the recent rises in mental health needs reported in children, targeted behavioral-and/or cognitive behavior therapy-based interventions should be made widely available to children (and their families) who experience elevated symptoms.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interventions for Young Children’s Mental Health: A Review of Reviews

Hudson,

Minihan,

Chen

et al. 2023

Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several reviews suggested that despite their wide applications, significant knowledge gaps exist regarding the effectiveness of various nonpharmacological interventions. These include mindfulness [187][188][189], neurofeedback [190][191][192][193], behavioral interventions [193], cognitive training [193], dietary interventions [194][195][196][197][198][199][200][201], herbal interventions [202,203], parent and teacher training [204,205], social skills training [206], school-based interventions [207], equine-assisted therapies [208,209], video modeling [210], acupuncture [211], and physical exercise [212].…”

Section: Children and Adolescentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Chaulagain,

Lyhmann,

Halmøy

et al. 2023

Eur. Psychiatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background There are now hundreds of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) of variable quality. To help navigate this literature, we have reviewed systematic reviews on any topic on ADHD. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and performed quality assessment according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. A total of 231 systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria. Results The prevalence of ADHD was 7.2% for children and adolescents and 2.5% for adults, though with major uncertainty due to methodological variation in the existing literature. There is evidence for both biological and social risk factors for ADHD, but this evidence is mostly correlational rather than causal due to confounding and reverse causality. There is strong evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment on symptom reduction in the short-term, particularly for stimulants. However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in mitigating adverse life trajectories such as educational attainment, employment, substance abuse, injuries, suicides, crime, and comorbid mental and somatic conditions. Pharmacotherapy is linked with side effects like disturbed sleep, reduced appetite, and increased blood pressure, but less is known about potential adverse effects after long-term use. Evidence of the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments is mixed. Conclusions Despite hundreds of systematic reviews on ADHD, key questions are still unanswered. Evidence gaps remain as to a more accurate prevalence of ADHD, whether documented risk factors are causal, the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments on any outcomes, and pharmacotherapy in mitigating the adverse outcomes associated with ADHD.

show abstract