2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of venoplasty versus stenting for the treatment of central vein obstruction in ipsilateral hemodialysis access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although early studies have reported unfavorable patency outcomes associated with endovascular stenting in the treatment of CVOD, such as in a study by Gray et al 50 that reported primary patency of only 20% at 12 months after bare metal stenting, more recent studies with improved stent designs and constructions have actually achieved better outcomes. A recent systematic review by Andrawos et al 51 reported pooled 12-month primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency of 53.8%, 70.9%, and 94%, respectively, after endovascular stenting for the treatment of hemodialysis related CVOD. Similarly, Akkakrisee and Hongsakul 52 reported a primary patency of 61.8% at 12 months when a venous specific bare metal stent was used to treat CVOD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although early studies have reported unfavorable patency outcomes associated with endovascular stenting in the treatment of CVOD, such as in a study by Gray et al 50 that reported primary patency of only 20% at 12 months after bare metal stenting, more recent studies with improved stent designs and constructions have actually achieved better outcomes. A recent systematic review by Andrawos et al 51 reported pooled 12-month primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency of 53.8%, 70.9%, and 94%, respectively, after endovascular stenting for the treatment of hemodialysis related CVOD. Similarly, Akkakrisee and Hongsakul 52 reported a primary patency of 61.8% at 12 months when a venous specific bare metal stent was used to treat CVOD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CVO/CVS is a relatively common and vital problem in HD patients, which lead to a wide range of complications and even results in decreased long-term patency rates and shortened survival ( 1 , 3 ). Endovascular treatment, including PTA and stent placement, is the preferred treatment for CVO/CVS ( 7 , 10 ). The decisive factors affecting the difficulty of endovascular treatment of CVO/CVS and the duration of postoperative patency are key clinical concerns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em uma revisão sistemática recente, publicada em setembro de 2021 no Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders por Andrawos et al 18 , foram analisadas nove séries de casos e oito estudos tipo coorte, com resultados de patência primária geral de 60% em 1 ano. Os casos tratados com stent apresentaram superioridade na patência primária, considerando um período de até 2 anos de seguimento, sendo que a maioria dos casos tratados com stent (301 de 345 doentes) foi precedida de angioplastia com balão, sendo utilizado stent nos casos de estenose residual ou recoil.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified