A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques to Reduce Violence Proneness by Interfering in Anger and Irritability

Abstract

The field of neurocriminology has proposed several treatments (e.g., pharmacological, brain surgery, androgen-deprivation therapy, neurofeedback) to reduce violence proneness, but unfortunately, their effectiveness has been limited due to their side-effects. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternative techniques to improve patients’ behavioural regulation with minimal undesirable effects. In this regard, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, which are based on applying changing magnetic fields or electric currents to interfere with cortical excitability, have revealed their usefulness in alleviating the symptomatology of several mental disorders. However, to our knowledge, there are no reviews that assess whether these techniques are useful for reducing violence proneness. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria using the following databases: PsycINFO, PubMed, Dialnet, Psicodoc, Web of Knowledge, and the Cochrane Library. We initially identified 3746 entries, and eventually included 56 publications. Most of the studies were unanimous in concluding that the application of these techniques over the prefrontal cortex (PFC) was not sufficient to promote anger and irritability reductions in euthymic individuals of both genders. Nevertheless, the application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, especially transcranial direct current stimulation, over the right PFC seemed to reduce violent reactions in these individuals by interfering with the interpretation of the unfavourable situations (e.g., threating signals) or inner states that evoked anger. In antisocial and pathological populations, the conclusions were provided by a few pilot studies with important methodological weaknesses. The main conclusion of these studies was that bilateral stimulation of the PFC satisfactorily reduced anger and irritability only in inmates, patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), people who suffered a closed-head injury, and agitated patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Moreover, combining these techniques with risperidone considerably reduced aggressiveness in these patients. Therefore, it is necessary to be cautious about the benefits of these techniques to control anger, due the methodological weaknesses of these studies. Nonetheless, they offer valuable opportunities to prevent violence by designing new treatments combining brain stimulation with current strategies, such as psychotherapy and psychopharmacology, in order to promote lasting changes.

Toxic Air Pollutants and Their Effect on Multiple Sclerosis: A Review Study

“…Air pollution is associated with behavioral changes because because it causes people to spend less time in the open and lead a more sedentary lifestyle, which can cause psychological distress and social isolation ( 66 , 67 ). The main negative effects of air pollution on the nervous system are more irritability, aggression, anger, and intolerance ( 68 , 69 ). Figure 3 shows sources of emission of toxic air pollutants in the environment.…”

Neural Decoding of Multi-Modal Imagery Behavior Focusing on Temporal Complexity

“…As it has in the present study, investigating higher brain functions such as mental imagery might expand our physiological and pathological understanding of psychiatric disorders and facilitate the search for their biomarkers. Furthermore, neural decoding might help treat psychiatric disorders by application of its detailed results to neuromodulation methods such as neurofeedback (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and transcranial stimulation (88,89).…”

“…In recent years, neural decoding research has progressed along with the expansion of machine learning (ML). Neural decoding has also been applied for interpreting mental states (1,2) and for treating various psychiatric disorders with neurofeedback (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). With the development of deep learning, decoding performance improvement is accelerating.…”

The role of intimate partner violence perpetrators' resting state functional connectivity in treatment compliance and recidivism

“…It might even be possible to go further and assess if there is an intrinsic resting-state activity relevant to understanding why certain individuals tend to react with violence. In fact, two recent systematic reviews concluded that this type of analysis could be used as an indicator or trait for proneness to violence 12 , 13 .…”

“…In this scenario, the violence linked to this imbalance could be attributed to high emotional content and impulsivity 15 . This model suggests that prefrontal regions (control system) are unable to regulate limbic irritability, which facilitates behavioral instability and violence under uncertain circumstances 12 , 13 , 15 . However, it is important to understand whether this imbalance is also applicable during resting periods or only during emotional processing processes.…”