A Systematic Review of the Criminogenic Potential of Synthetic Biology and Routes to Future Crime Prevention

Abstract

Synthetic biology has the potential to positively transform society in many application areas, including medicine. In common with all revolutionary new technologies, synthetic biology can also enable crime. Like cybercrime, that emerged following the advent of the internet, biocrime can have a significant effect on society, but may also impact on peoples' health. For example, the scale of harm caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic illustrates the potential impact of future biocrime and highlights the need for prevention strategies. Systematic evidence quantifying the crime opportunities posed by synthetic biology has to date been very limited. Here, we systematically reviewed forms of crime that could be facilitated by synthetic biology with a view to informing their prevention. A total of 794 articles from four databases were extracted and a three-step screening phase resulted in 15 studies that met our threshold criterion for thematic synthesis. Within those studies, 13 exploits were identified. Of these, 46% were dependent on technologies characteristic of synthetic biology. Eight potential crime types emerged from the studies: bio-discrimination, cyber-biocrime, bio-malware, biohacking, at-home drug manufacturing, illegal gene editing, genetic blackmail, and neuro-hacking. 14 offender types were identified. For the most commonly identified offenders (>3 mentions) 40% were outsider threats. These observations suggest that synthetic biology presents substantial new offending opportunities. Moreover, that more effective engagement, such as ethical hacking, is needed now to prevent a crime harvest from developing in the future. A framework to address the synthetic biology crime landscape is proposed.

Evolving the Cybersecurity of Clinical Photography in Plastic Surgery

“…Acknowledgments: None. Daisy L. Spoer, MS 1,2 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”

“…Evolving the Cybersecurity of Clinical Photography in Plastic Surgery Daisy L. Spoer, MS 1,2 ; Alexandra Junn, MD 2 ; John D. Bovill, BS 1 ; Zoë K. Haffner, BS 1 ; Andrew I. Abadeer, MD MEng 2 ; Stephen B. Baker, MD, DDS 2 1. Georgetown University School of Medicine; Washington, District of Columbia.…”

“…These theoretical consequences have surfaced as breaches of plastic surgery photos and associated biometrics have led to blackmail, ransoms, irreversible identity theft, and permitted access to bank accounts and personal information. 1,2 This is concerning in the context of the Federal Court case, Hazlitt v. Apple Inc., 2021, in which Apple is facing a class action for violating the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. The plaintiffs alleged that the Apple Photos app uses FRT software to collect and store digital faceprint databases that users cannot limit the control or remove from their phone.…”

Synthetic biology tools for engineering Goodwin oscillation in Trypanosoma brucei brucei

“…Synthetic biology is a relatively new field which can be defined as a multidisciplinary effort to make living biological material easier to engineer ( Elgabry et al., 2020 ), enabling new products or functions that are not produced by natural biology. Studies in the field, such as this one, may advance the tractability of biology to engineering approaches as a foundation for future, as yet unidentified functions or products.…”

Digital DNA lifecycle security and privacy: an overview

“…Genetic blackmailing is one of the main concerns. An adversary could identify individuals by combining websites such as peoplefinders.com and publicly available (even though anonymised) genomic data from sources such as 23andme.com [7].…”