A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance

Abstract

Objectives We draw on a systematic review of research on two-way communication between patients and health practitioners about medicines in order to determine the extent to which concordance is, or is not, being put into practice.Data sources Six electronic databases were searched using the following categories of search terms: health care professionals, patients/consumers, medicine-taking/prescribing and communication. Articles were also identified from handsearches of journals, article reference lists and the Concordance website.Review methods Studies published between 1991 and 2000 were included. Studies were not excluded on the basis of design, methods or language employed. Abstracts of identified articles were assessed by at least two reviewers and the full articles were assessed by one reviewer and checked by at least one other reviewer. Data on the design, analysis and relevant findings were extracted.Results A total of 11 801 abstracts were reviewed and 470 full articles were retrieved. Of the 134 articles subsequently included, 116 were descriptive studies. All but 10 of the papers were written in English.There were mixed findings about the extent to which patients feel that their beliefs, experience and preferences about medicines can be shared. Doctors tend to dominate discussions in consultations, although patient participation is associated with positive outcomes. Health care professionalsÕ behaviour can impede as well as enhance patient involvement.Conclusions There is little research that examines fundamental issues for concordance such as whether an exchange of views takes place. It is possible that interventions are needed to facilitate the development of concordance in practice.

A Patient Safety Toolkit for Family Practices

“…Cresswell et al 25 noted that communication between patients and health professionals was a source of patient safety incidents if health professionals do not engage in collaborative communication. 26 The PREOS-PC showed that patients had a positive perception of the overall safety of their practice. However, almost half reported at least one safety problem in the last 12 months.…”

The Challenges of Oral Agents as Antineoplastic Treatments

“…70,71 A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and healthcare providers about medications found that when physicians tended to dominate discussions, patient adherence decreased. 72,73 Out-of-pocket costs. Out-of-pocket costs for medications have been found to be a risk factor for nonadherence.…”

Communication as a Key Issue in the Care of Diabetes Mellitus

“…First, patients consider discussions about drug administration important, but they are even more content when feeling encouraged to bring their own preoccupations into discussion, even though physicians tend to have a predominant speaking role during consultation. Second, patients wish that doctors encourage them and give them time to ask additional questions [8].…”