A Systematic Review of the Quality of Economic Models Comparing Thrombosis Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Hatz, Maximilian H. M.; Leidl, Reiner; Yates, Nichola; Stollenwerk, Björn

doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0128-4

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 69 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To date, this is the first systematic review that depicts the characteristics of decision analytical models used in this field and quantitatively assessed the methodological quality with the widely used Philips’ checklist. The methodological quality of the models is comparable with the findings from peers’ studies in other areas as acute coronary syndrome [43] and lower extremity artery disease [44] but still unsatisfying.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

“…Although results derived from RCTs are more reliable in quantifying the effect of interventions, observational evidence (e.g., disease registries and administrative claim data) may be more useful in estimating the natural progression of the disease, resource use/cost, and utility data [50]. Moreover, observational data can be used to mitigate against the shortage of RCT data as it might miss interested events or combine the endpoints as outcomes [43]. Published literature is an important aggregate data source for modeling, which was adapted by most of the included studies in this review.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are useful approaches to solving disagreements in the literature, at least for important effectiveness parameters or the main clinical effects of interests. However, for many researchers, it is not feasible to perform a systematic review because of the restriction of time and other resources, thus an explanation for choice of data source should be made to assure the reliability and validity of the model [43]. Expert opinion was adapted in one study, which was used as an additional data source.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review of decision analytic modeling techniques for the economic evaluation of dental caries interventions

Zhang

Krauth

et al. 2019

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Dental caries occur through a multifactorial process that may influence all tooth surfaces throughout an individual’s life. The application of decision analytical modeling (DAM) has gained an increasing level of attention in long-term outcome assessment and economic evaluation of interventions on caries in recent years. The objective of this study was to systematically review the application of DAM and assess their methodological quality in the context of dental caries. Methods A systematic review of the literature published to 31 st December 2018 was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, NHSEED, and Web of Science electronic databases. The main information and model characteristics of studies was extracted with the methodological quality of included studies reviewed and assessed using the Philips’ checklist. Results Twenty five studies from different settings were included. Modeling techniques mainly comprised main type of modeling including Markov models (n = 12), Markov/microsimulation mixed model (n = 7), systematic dynamic models (n = 3), microsimulation models (n = 2) and decision tree (n = 1). The mean number of criteria fulfilled was 25.1 out of 60 items, which varied between year of study and research groups. The percentage of criteria fulfilled for data dimension was lower than for the structure and consistency dimension. Critical issues were data quality, incorporation of utility values, and uncertainty analysis in modeling. Conclusion The current review revealed that the methodological quality of DAM in dental caries economic evaluations is unsatisfied. Future modeling studies should adhere more closely to good practice guidelines, especially with respect to data quality evaluation, utility values incorporation, and uncertainty analysis in DAM based studies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of decision analytic modeling techniques for the economic evaluation of dental caries interventions

Zhang

Krauth

et al. 2019

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A review of broad technology assessment: Citation-based analysis

Liu

2017

2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of quality and cost–effectiveness derived from Markov models evaluating smoking cessation interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Kirsch

2015

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smoking cessation is the only strategy that has shown a lasting reduction in the decline of lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to assess the quality of the Markov models and to estimate the consequences of model structure and input data on cost-effectiveness. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, BusinessSourceComplete and Econlit on June 11, 2014. Data were extracted, and costs were inflated. Model quality was evaluated by a quality appraisal, and results were interpreted. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The results varied widely from cost savings to additional costs of €17,004 per quality adjusted life year. The models scored best in the category structure, followed by data and consistency. The quality of the models seems to rise over time, and regarding the results there is no economic reason to refuse the reimbursement of any smoking cessation intervention.

show abstract

A Systematic Review of the Quality of Economic Models Comparing Thrombosis Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Cited by 5 publications

References 69 publications

A systematic review of decision analytic modeling techniques for the economic evaluation of dental caries interventions

A systematic review of decision analytic modeling techniques for the economic evaluation of dental caries interventions

A review of broad technology assessment: Citation-based analysis

A systematic review of quality and cost–effectiveness derived from Markov models evaluating smoking cessation interventions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About