2022
DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2022.2132905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the mental health of women in construction: future research directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SLR was conducted employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines consisting of four phases: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion for review [22]. Similar studies [23] have recommend adopting the PRISMA technique to decrease bias and increase the review's rigour and replicability. The process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLR was conducted employing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines consisting of four phases: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion for review [22]. Similar studies [23] have recommend adopting the PRISMA technique to decrease bias and increase the review's rigour and replicability. The process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study, however, indicates that construction is an unappealing occupation choice for women due to factors such as work hygiene, poor WLB, and gender inequality. For an organization, this management component should be considered significantly [30,62]. The organization as management adds to the overall depth of knowledge by discovering latent QWL factors that influence the job satisfaction of craftsmen, particularly in the CI.…”
Section: Contributions From Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%