2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of community and population interventions to reduce the modifiable risk factors for dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should also investigate how modification of risk factors among individuals with a low SEP can be achieved cost-effectively and implemented at the population level. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should also investigate how modification of risk factors among individuals with a low SEP can be achieved cost-effectively and implemented at the population level. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary prevention approaches can utilise individualised, clinical approaches -which identify those at increased risk and support them to reduce risk; or population-level approaches -which change societal conditions to reduce risk exposure for the whole population. 5,6 Existing approaches to dementia risk reduction have heavily favoured individual-level approaches, 7 which typically widen inequalities and cannot significantly reduce disease prevalence. 5 The World Health Organization have recognised that redressing this imbalance is a public health research priority.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary prevention of dementia – action to reduce the risk factors – could therefore become an attractive option for policymakers. Primary prevention approaches can utilise individualised, clinical approaches – which identify those at increased risk and support them to reduce risk; or population‐level approaches – which change societal conditions to reduce risk exposure for the whole population 5,6 . Existing approaches to dementia risk reduction have heavily favoured individual‐level approaches, 7 which typically widen inequalities and cannot significantly reduce disease prevalence 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This definition means that people may have some substantial risk for developing dementia but are "clinically asymptomatic individuals with biological evidence of Alzheimer 's pathology" (Dubois et al, 2010: p. 5). So far, the health economic literature has focused solely on the risk-factors (21) or clinical disease stage (22)(23)(24). Thus, we identified a research gap in the literature of Cost-Effectiveness of primary prevention for people at the at-risk-state (25,26).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the 'Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability' (FINGER)study, a randomized controlled trial based on multimodal nonpharmacological lifestyle interventions, showed effectiveness for preventing dementia due to multimodal interventions and alongside health economic studies on cost-effectiveness of prevention of dementia have been published and indicated a cost-saving potential for prevention strategies (7,(39)(40)(41). Walsh et al (2022) showed also with a high-quality systematic review of evidence, that the reduction of the defined risk factors by Livingston et al (2020) and the WHO (2019) is highly cost-effective and in some cases also cost-saving. But no health economic evidence-synthesis was conducted using a clearly defined 'people at risk' population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%