A systematic review of the quality, content, and context of breakfast consumption

Abstract

Abstract.Purpose: Consumption of breakfast is often associated with important health related behaviours. For example, skipping breakfast is related to obesity and eating breakfast is also correlated to cognitive, behavioural, and affective components. This paper attempts to review the breakfast eating literature, and investigate the circumstances under which people consume breakfast, what is actually being consumed, and how much breakfast is eaten therefore Method/Approach: This systematic review summarised the results from 24 studies which focus on who is eating what, where, and with whom.Findings: All 24 of the included studies were of a self report nature, from which nine were analyses from second-hand survey data. Sample sizes varied from 100 to a total of 35119 with a reported participants" age range from two years old to 70 years of age. Ready-to-eat cereal and dairy foods were the most commonly consumed breakfast items across the studies. Between 1.7 and 30% of participants were found to skip breakfast and approximately one quarter of the studies reported that those with lower socioeconomic status, non-whites and females were the groups more likely to omit breakfast. Practical implications and Limitations:The evidence provided in this review suggests that there is still considerable variation in studies into breakfast consumption. This has implications for future research into breakfast eating if interventions are based on these studies. Originality/Value:There are very few systematic reviews detailing the quality, context and content of breakfast consumption and the lack of consistency in the results show the need for further research to be conducted to find a degree of consistency in how breakfast should be defined and measured.

Association of breakfast intake with obesity, dietary and physical activity behavior among urban school-aged adolescents in Delhi, India: results of a cross-sectional study

“…These options were further collapsed into three categories, “Never”, “Sometimes” (which included “1-2 times in a week,” “3-4 times in a week,” and “5-6 times in a week”) and “Daily” during analysis. This representation of breakfast consumption is consistent with prior studies [45]. …”

Predicting adolescent breakfast consumption in the UK and Australia using an extended theory of planned behaviour

“…Although a variety of schools were contacted from various regions, the majority of participants were from high SES backgrounds and Caucasian ethnicity. Breakfast consumption is known to vary according to sociodemographic factors -such that breakfast skipping is higher in lower SES groups (Mullan & Singh, 2010). The relative sociodemographic homogeneity of the current sample may limit the extent to which findings from this study can be generalised to other populations.…”

Dietary-Related and Physical Activity-Related Predictors of Obesity in Children: A 2-Year Prospective Study

“…25 Consumption of fruits and vegetables, dietary fat, and juice were not associated with obesity as measured via bMi or percent body fat. Although some studies have found that consumption of fruits and vegetables, dietary fat, and juice were related to obesity in children, the results are inconsistent.…”