2020
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1797160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the clinical and radiographic features of hybrid central giant cell granuloma lesions of the jaws

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the main lesion was over 1 cm, and it affected the neighboring skull base radiologically, so it was more likely to be diagnosed as an osteoblastoma. Giant cell lesions of the jaws also show similar radiographic and clinical features to osteoblastoma (22). However, giant cell lesions of the jaws are always composed of fibrous connective tissue, irregularly distributed multinucleated giant cells, abundant blood vessels, a little bone-like tissue, and a large amount of hemosiderin in histopathological slices (23), so they can be distinguished accordingly.…”
Section: Differentiation Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the main lesion was over 1 cm, and it affected the neighboring skull base radiologically, so it was more likely to be diagnosed as an osteoblastoma. Giant cell lesions of the jaws also show similar radiographic and clinical features to osteoblastoma (22). However, giant cell lesions of the jaws are always composed of fibrous connective tissue, irregularly distributed multinucleated giant cells, abundant blood vessels, a little bone-like tissue, and a large amount of hemosiderin in histopathological slices (23), so they can be distinguished accordingly.…”
Section: Differentiation Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Several reports suggest there are three theories for its development 1) reactive origin to a local irritant, 2) development anomaly and 3) neoplastic etiology. [2][3][4] CGCG is more commonly found in the mandible and mainly in a young females. 2 It can be seen classified as "aggressive" or "non-aggressive" radiologically, clinically, and histologically (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] CGCG is more commonly found in the mandible and mainly in a young females. 2 It can be seen classified as "aggressive" or "non-aggressive" radiologically, clinically, and histologically (Table 1). 2,[4][5][6]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second claims that CGCG is a developmental anomaly, while the third implies that such a lesion has a neoplastic attribution. 2,[4][5][6] In 1986, Chuong and co-workers 3 documented a series of 17 cases of CGCG of the jaws in children and adolescents, among whom aggressive CGCG was observed, characterized by pain, rapid growth, root resorption, cortical perforation, with a mean diameter of 5.8 cm, and a high rate of recurrence. Since the varied biological behavior of CGCG is not linked to histopathological features or molecular alterations and does not allow the practitioner to determine the prognosis of this condition, 7,8 some studies have indicated that the relative percentage of giant cells and immunohistochemically stained mononuclear cells for glucocorticoid and/or calcitonin receptors can be used as a reliable and effective tool for selecting the optimal treatment for individuals with CGCG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%