A systematic review of strategies to recruit and retain primary care doctors

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a workforce crisis in primary care. Previous research has looked at the reasons underlying recruitment and retention problems, but little research has looked at what works to improve recruitment and retention. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate interventions and strategies used to recruit and retain primary care doctors internationally.MethodsA systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and grey literature were searched from inception to January 2015. Articles assessing interventions aimed at recruiting or retaining doctors in high income countries, applicable to primary care doctors were included. No restrictions on language or year of publication. The first author screened all titles and abstracts and a second author screened 20 %. Data extraction was carried out by one author and checked by a second. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity.ResultsFifty-one studies assessing 42 interventions were retrieved. Interventions were categorised into thirteen groups: financial incentives (n = 11), recruiting rural students (n = 6), international recruitment (n = 4), rural or primary care focused undergraduate placements (n = 3), rural or underserved postgraduate training (n = 3), well-being or peer support initiatives (n = 3), marketing (n = 2), mixed interventions (n = 5), support for professional development or research (n = 5), retainer schemes (n = 4), re-entry schemes (n = 1), specialised recruiters or case managers (n = 2) and delayed partnerships (n = 2).Studies were of low methodological quality with no RCTs and only 15 studies with a comparison group. Weak evidence supported the use of postgraduate placements in underserved areas, undergraduate rural placements and recruiting students to medical school from rural areas. There was mixed evidence about financial incentives. A marketing campaign was associated with lower recruitment.ConclusionsThis is the first systematic review of interventions to improve recruitment and retention of primary care doctors. Although the evidence base for recruiting and care doctors is weak and more high quality research is needed, this review found evidence to support undergraduate and postgraduate placements in underserved areas, and selective recruitment of medical students. Other initiatives covered may have potential to improve recruitment and retention of primary care practitioners, but their effectiveness has not been established.

Addressing the crisis of GP recruitment and retention: a systematic review

“…19 This review suggests that most studies on primary care physician recruitment (for example, GPs and family doctors) have predominantly focused on remote rural locations. However, the authors identified a number of studies that examined the determinants influencing recruitment that would be relevant to general practice.…”

Re: Over Half of Graduating Family Medicine Residents Report More Than $150,000 in Educational Debt

“…The number of GPs as a proportion of National Health Service doctors has instead decreased nearly every year in the last 20. 4 Is this due to a financial disincentive?…”

“…Growing discontent among GPs in recent years has lead to dwindling retention, with 30% of GPs now intending to leave direct patient care in the next 5 years. 4 Furthermore, primary care is not viewed by young doctors as the appealing career it once was, with many using it as a back-up choice.…”

Working hard but working differently: a qualitative study of the impact of generational change on rural health care

“…The evidence suggests some commonalities across generations among physicians who choose rural practice. [3][4][5][6][7][8] We aimed to explore rural practitioners' experiences to understand the adaptations, successes and challenges influencing recruitment and retention in rural health care to answer the question of how practices are responding to the influence of the incoming generation of practitioners.…”

“…2 Current evidence suggests that rural upbringing and exposure to rural practice during training can encourage interest in rural careers. [3][4][5][6][7] Character traits such as novelty seeking and low harm avoidance have been associated with physician interest in rural practice. 8 In attempts to increase recruitment of physicians to rural areas, some medical schools have sought to identify students with rural affinity during the admissions process, 9 and others have noted positive impacts on the rural workforce through creating a rural generalist training pathway.…”