2023
DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K‐12 education

Peng Zhang,
Gemma Tur

Abstract: This systematic review, adhering to the PRISMA framework, investigated the utilisation of ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI, throughout Kindergarten to 12th grade (K‐12) educational settings. The review synthesises findings from 13 selected papers, encompassing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of ChatGPT's implementation in K‐12 education, implications for various stakeholders, and practical recommendations. It is highlighted that ChatGPT could empower educators… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, another line of research is exploring the utilization of NLP-like techniques to process molecular data. , This is because, in numerous chemical databases, the prevalent practice is to store molecular information as SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System) strings, which enables the representation of a compound’s structure through a succinct text string. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), which have increasingly demonstrated formidable inferential capabilities in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and related scientific tasks. Notably, ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, represents one of the most advanced iterations of these models, and has found extensive application across various specialized domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, another line of research is exploring the utilization of NLP-like techniques to process molecular data. , This is because, in numerous chemical databases, the prevalent practice is to store molecular information as SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System) strings, which enables the representation of a compound’s structure through a succinct text string. In recent years, significant advancements have been made in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), which have increasingly demonstrated formidable inferential capabilities in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and related scientific tasks. Notably, ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, represents one of the most advanced iterations of these models, and has found extensive application across various specialized domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16) En última instancia, su aplicación puede aumentar la eficacia y la productividad del proceso de aprendizaje, enriqueciendo la experiencia educativa y contribuyendo a la creación de un entorno académico más efectivo y estimulante. (17) En relación a las limitaciones y posibles usos indebidos de ChatGPT, surgen varias preocupaciones que requieren atención. En primer lugar, se ha observado con frecuencia la generación de contenido superficial, inexacto o incorrecto al utilizar ChatGPT en la escritura científica, lo que plantea interrogantes sobre su fiabilidad y precisión.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…There are various applications of AI bots in journalism and media education, scientific applications like peer reviews, drug discovery, material design, or even scientific discovery itself . In education, initial research on using generative AI mainly revolved around strengths and weaknesses and opportunities and challenges. , Scholars extensively tested what potential ChatGPT has in the educational context by evaluating answers given by the generative AI and proposed a range of applications in several fields of education. This same development was seen in chemistry education, where scientists evaluated academic answers given by AI, describing mixed performances by ChatGPT in terms of application of knowledge. , They compared AI-generated answers to student answers and found that the AI was sound in some areas but made mathematical mistakes that students would not make . Further, they yielded a range of applications in chemistry education like writing lab reports and promoting metacognition by evaluation of AI-generated answers, highlighting the need for critical and reflective use of AI. It is important to note that in the context of chemistry it has been shown that there are certain shortcomings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%