Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of scholar context-aware recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientific research papers are normally categorised based on their methods and approach. Glass et al (2002), Musumba and Nyongesa (2013) and Ramesh et al (2014) 2 have identified context acquisition, sensing, modelling, inference Schmidt, 2013;Champiri et al, 2015) as contending issues in context-awareness services using context interaction. The classification used in this study is employed from similar SLR research articles such as Ampatzoglou and Stamelos (2010), relating the whole idea to the concept of research of interest conducted in this study.…”
Section: Classification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific research papers are normally categorised based on their methods and approach. Glass et al (2002), Musumba and Nyongesa (2013) and Ramesh et al (2014) 2 have identified context acquisition, sensing, modelling, inference Schmidt, 2013;Champiri et al, 2015) as contending issues in context-awareness services using context interaction. The classification used in this study is employed from similar SLR research articles such as Ampatzoglou and Stamelos (2010), relating the whole idea to the concept of research of interest conducted in this study.…”
Section: Classification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the traditional recommender systems only two things users and items are considered while giving recommendations. So, traditional recommender systems are two-dimensional and can be described by the rating function S [6] as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass et al (2002), Musumba and Nyongesa (2013) and Ramesh et al (2014) 2 have identified context acquisition, sensing, modelling, inference Schmidt, 2013;Champiri et al, 2015) as contending issues in context-awareness services using context interaction. The classification used in this study is employed from similar SLR research articles such as Ampatzoglou and Stamelos (2010), relating the whole idea to the concept of research of interest conducted in this study.…”
Section: Classification Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%