2019
DOI: 10.1111/ced.13980
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of reported cases of pachyonychia congenita tarda

Abstract: Summary Pachyonychia congenita (PC) describes a group of genodermatoses manifesting as thickened nails, palmoplantar keratoderma (PPK) and increased risk of cutaneous infections. PC tarda (PCT) describes late‐onset PC, and associated genetic polymorphisms have been identified. There has been discussion that PCT may not be a distinct entity but rather misdiagnosed ectodermal dysplasia (ED) or PPK. Clarification of this is important for appropriate diagnosis, management and patient and genetic counselling. We ai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PC is a rare, autosomal dominant condition which has been historically diagnosed using clinical criteria [39,46]. Confirmation of diagnoses by genetic testing [47] and the establishment of the IPCRR have allowed for a more scientific and accurate classification [48] into distinct subtypes. Using a self-reported patient survey of PC patients, we examined several nail related aspects of PC under the genetic classifications.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PC is a rare, autosomal dominant condition which has been historically diagnosed using clinical criteria [39,46]. Confirmation of diagnoses by genetic testing [47] and the establishment of the IPCRR have allowed for a more scientific and accurate classification [48] into distinct subtypes. Using a self-reported patient survey of PC patients, we examined several nail related aspects of PC under the genetic classifications.…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the article by Tatian et al. 2019 1 , the name of the first author was misspelled. The correct spelling should be “Tatian” instead of “Tatiane”.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%