2021
DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2021.0121118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Published Articles, Phases and Activities in an Online Social Networks Forensic Investigation Domain

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to retrieve, evaluate and analyse the available published articles in five (5) relevant online databases from 2011 to 2021 and also critically identify the phases and activities involved in an Online Social Networks Forensic Investigation based on bibliometric analysis and Degree of confidence respectively in order to know the evolution in the research domain. A systematic literature review (SLR) technique was adopted by the author to search using pre-defined keywords. Only scholar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of them use similar methodologies and ignore the essential differences and special needs of online social networks. The main challenge is the use of a nonuniform and ad-hoc forensic techniques in the existing DFIM's [1]. The employment of non-standard and ad hoc forensic techniques and processes not only diminishes the effectiveness of the process, but it also undermines the dependability and creditability of the evidence in criminal cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of them use similar methodologies and ignore the essential differences and special needs of online social networks. The main challenge is the use of a nonuniform and ad-hoc forensic techniques in the existing DFIM's [1]. The employment of non-standard and ad hoc forensic techniques and processes not only diminishes the effectiveness of the process, but it also undermines the dependability and creditability of the evidence in criminal cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%