2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of prediction methods for emergency management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 163 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the safety of building ruins, seismic rescue experts in China usually refer to "Dangerous Building Appraisal Standards" (JGJ125-99 2004) [20] and "Earthquake Site Work Part II: Building Safety Appraisal" (GB18208.2 2001) [21]. Additionally, a systematic review of prediction methods for emergency management and seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies were published [22,23]. However, the above standards only divide the damage level of collapsed buildings, but the impact factors of the construction of life-saving passages in building ruins are not considered, for example, the infuence of aftershocks on the safety of the life-saving passages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the safety of building ruins, seismic rescue experts in China usually refer to "Dangerous Building Appraisal Standards" (JGJ125-99 2004) [20] and "Earthquake Site Work Part II: Building Safety Appraisal" (GB18208.2 2001) [21]. Additionally, a systematic review of prediction methods for emergency management and seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies were published [22,23]. However, the above standards only divide the damage level of collapsed buildings, but the impact factors of the construction of life-saving passages in building ruins are not considered, for example, the infuence of aftershocks on the safety of the life-saving passages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still a challenge to determine the extent of the damage and the possible affected assets and populations, if solely utilize the hydrodynamic model. Therefore, with the emerging of geospatial technology, efforts on combining hydrodynamic model with 3S technology (remote sensing, GIS and global positioning system (GPS) have been applied for efficient development and analysis of dam break studies [7]. The availability of open source software and data has offer an advantage of obtaining various data sources for crisis and disaster mapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency response is a field that has been widely studied (Huang et al., 2021 ) classifies emergency response activities into three phases: preevent, in‐event and postevent. Among them, emergency response during events is extremely challenging due to psychological and technical reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%