A Systematic Review of Picosecond Laser in Dermatology: Evidence and Recommendations

Abstract

Background and Objectives The use of picosecond laser in dermatology was originally focused on optimizing the removal of unwanted tattoos. Subsequent advances in this technology have broadened its clinical indications to include treatment of benign pigmented lesions, photodamage, melasma, and scar revision. In this systematic review, evidence‐based recommendations are developed for the use of picosecond laser in dermatology. Study Design/Materials and Methods A comprehensive search of the English language literature was performed up to and including November 2019. Relevant citations were individually evaluated, synthesized, and categorized based on the Level of Evidence. With the addition of the authors’ combined clinical experience, clinical recommendations were developed. Results After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 77 unique studies were evaluated. Treatment of benign pigmented lesions was associated with level I–IV evidence; rejuvenation was associated with level II evidence; melasma was associated with level II evidence; scar revision was associated with level II–III evidence; tattoo removal was associated with level I evidence. Conclusion Picosecond laser is a safe and effective treatment modality for an increasing range of dermatologic indications. Further development of this technology is warranted. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A Prospective, Split‐Face, Randomized Study Comparing a 755‐nm Picosecond Laser With and Without Diffractive Lens Array in the Treatment of Melasma in Asians

“…Thermal damage seems to be the greatest drawback of conventional Q‐switched laser treatment for patients with melasma, and likely the cause of the high incidence of PIH after treatment. A recent systematic review by Wu et al [10] reported the use of picosecond lasers for melasma in one case series, one prospective open‐label trial, four prospective, randomized split‐face trials, and one randomized controlled trial and concluded that this modality may be offered as an adjunctive treatment in patients with moderate to severe melasma. However, it was also mentioned that the safety and efficacy of fractionated versus nonfractionated delivery is yet to be confirmed.…”

Laser tattoo removal: Fundamental principles and practical approach

“…In order to achieve similar results, QS lasers on average required far greater fluence than PS lasers and consequently higher risk of side effects. In addition, they recommended that PS lasers to be used as the gold standard for laser tattoo removal of any color with level of evidence of 1A 41 …”

Hypertrophic scars and keloids—Treatment with fractional lasers

“…Novel technologies like picosecond lasers, have been used successfully in the treatment of hypertrophic scars revealing histological changes like collagen fiber reconfiguration and reduction of epidermal thickness in hypertrophic scars 60 but evidence remains scarce, considered as level 3c 61 …”