2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09549-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Normative Data for Verbal Fluency Test in Different Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VF in a healthy group of schoolchildren was associated only with school grades in the Russian language, while performance in such subjects as literature, biology, and math had no significant statistical influence. Similar studies for English-speaking participants show correlation of VF not only with grades in English but also with grades in math [31]. The differences between these results may be related to the peculiarities of the Russian language, as structures of Russian and English languages are very different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…VF in a healthy group of schoolchildren was associated only with school grades in the Russian language, while performance in such subjects as literature, biology, and math had no significant statistical influence. Similar studies for English-speaking participants show correlation of VF not only with grades in English but also with grades in math [31]. The differences between these results may be related to the peculiarities of the Russian language, as structures of Russian and English languages are very different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…It is also easily administered and straight forward to score, requiring no lengthy training for standardized administration. An individual's performance on phonemic fluency depends on their stored knowledge, their ability to phonologically search and retrieve relevant information based on that knowledge, and their capacity to maintain selective attention in a sustained manner throughout the task duration [2,25]. While lower performance on phonemic fluency does not necessarily indicate specific neurological conditions, they can be used as a sensitive marker for detecting cognitive impairment [35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testing process engages not only attention regulation and working memory, but also the implementation of strategies for producing word exemplars, monitoring previously produced words, and inhibiting repetitions. It therefore provides a wealth of information regarding an individual's cognitive processes such as language retrieval, cognitive flexibility, and executive functioning [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbal fluency reflects the ability to spontaneously produce words under restricted search conditions [ 6 ], which includes three types, namely, letter fluency, semantic/categorical fluency, and motor/action fluency [ 7 , 8 ]. Verbal fluency has been widely measured to assess cognitive function and language content after nervous system impairment [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbal fluency has been widely measured to assess cognitive function and language content after nervous system impairment [ 9 ]. More specifically, letter fluency tests request subjects to produce words in mind with a restricted initial letter (such as “F”, “A”, “S”, and so on) [ 6 ], semantic fluency tests request subjects to produce words (nouns) in mind with a restricted category (such as animals, vegetables, fruits, and so on) [ 6 ], while motor fluency tests requests subjects to produce words (verbs) in mind [ 6 ]. All three types of tests request the subjects to speak out the words that they produce in mind but do not request the subjects to pronounce them clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%