A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre clinical trials

Abstract

BackgroundLess than one third of publicly funded trials managed to recruit according to their original plan often resulting in request for additional funding and/or time extensions. The aim was to identify models which might be useful to a major public funder of randomised controlled trials when estimating likely time requirements for recruiting trial participants. The requirements of a useful model were identified as usability, based on experience, able to reflect time trends, accounting for centre recruitment and contribution to a commissioning decision.MethodsA systematic review of English language articles using MEDLINE and EMBASE. Search terms included: randomised controlled trial, patient, accrual, predict, enrol, models, statistical; Bayes Theorem; Decision Theory; Monte Carlo Method and Poisson. Only studies discussing prediction of recruitment to trials using a modelling approach were included. Information was extracted from articles by one author, and checked by a second, using a pre-defined form.ResultsOut of 326 identified abstracts, only 8 met all the inclusion criteria. Of these 8 studies examined, there are five major classes of model discussed: the unconditional model, the conditional model, the Poisson model, Bayesian models and Monte Carlo simulation of Markov models. None of these meet all the pre-identified needs of the funder.ConclusionsTo meet the needs of a number of research programmes, a new model is required as a matter of importance. Any model chosen should be validated against both retrospective and prospective data, to ensure the predictions it gives are superior to those currently used.

Folate Augmentation of Treatment – Evaluation for Depression (FolATED): randomised trial and economic evaluation

“…180 Barnard et al looked at the recruitment of participants into trials from a different perspective and aimed to identify different models that may be useful to RCTs when estimating the recruitment of participants. 181 They noted that most trials use an unconditional model of recruitment and suggested that a new model was needed to predict recruitment to clinical trials which takes account of both centre and patient recruitment, recognising that one drives the other.…”

Clinical trial metadata: defining and extracting metadata on the design, conduct, results and costs of 125 randomised clinical trials funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme

“…77 Ninety per cent of trials in this cohort recruited their target number of centres and 50% recruited more than the initial number that they thought they needed. Most surprisingly, 20% of studies recruited more than twice the number of centres initially planned.…”

Real-time prediction of clinical trial enrollment and event counts: A review

“…Barnard et al [8] reviewed methods for predicting enrollment counts, and Zhang et al [53] reviewed methods for predicting enrollment and events. In this article we cover both areas, providing a more comprehensive and up-todate list of citations and, we intend, a more critical evaluation of the methods.…”